跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04791020
NCT04791020已完成不适用

Topic Cervical Anesthesia Plus Paracervical Blockade vs. Topical Cervical Anesthesia Alone for Pain Control During Endouterine Manual Aspiration

Saint Thomas Hospital, Panama1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 100 人开始时间: 2021年3月8日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
100
试验地点
1
主要终点
Global evaluation of pain

研究概览

简要总结

To compare the effectiveness of lidocaine gel plus paracervical blockade vs. lidocaine gel alone in the management of pain during endouterine manual aspiration.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

性别
Female
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Need for a endouterine manual aspiration (incomplete abortion or gynecological bleeding).

排除标准

  • Allergy to lidocain

研究组 & 干预措施

Lidocaine + paracervical blockade

Active Comparator

5 minutes previous to endouterine manual aspiration, 5mL of lidocaine gel was applied plus standard paracervical blockade.

干预措施: Lidocain topical + paracervical blockade (Drug)

Lidocaine

Experimental

5 minutes previous to endouterine manual aspiration, 5mL of lidocaine gel was applied.

干预措施: Lidocaine topical (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

Global evaluation of pain

时间窗: 5 minutes post procedure

Visible scale of pain evaluation

次要结局

  • Adverse reaction(5 minutes post procedure)

研究者

发起方
Saint Thomas Hospital, Panama
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Osvaldo A. Reyes T.

Coordinator of research

Saint Thomas Hospital, Panama

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验