Leveraging the Emergency Department to Engage African American Women in HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- HIV Infections
- Sponsor
- The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
- Enrollment
- 40
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Number of participants with an increased willingness for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 3 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
African American (AA) women are more vulnerable to HIV infection than other women. Truvada, when used as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), is one of the most effective approaches for HIV prevention; however, PrEP use among AA women remains low and has not responded to traditional interventions. This study proposes for the first time an innovative computer-based motivational intervention, increasing PrEP uptake (iPrEP), which couples motivational messages woven into a traditional survey to raise awareness of risky sex and substance use behaviors.
Investigators
Mandy Hill
Associate Professor
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Current HIV negative status (based on ED' HIV test outcome)
- •Condomless sex in the last 3 months
- •Substance use in the last 3 months
- •HIV testing during ED visit (usual care)
- •Has a non-emergent health condition
- •Has a working mobile device with them
Exclusion Criteria
- •Ineligible for PrEP (see eligibility criteria to the right)
- •Assigned male at birth
- •An HIV positive status
- •Currently taking medication that are known contraindications for PrEP (brand name: Truvada)
- •Currently on PrEP
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Number of participants with an increased willingness for pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) uptake
Time Frame: 6 months
Participants will be assessed for social norms and risk.
Secondary Outcomes
- iPrEP feasibility and acceptability as assessed by the number of participants who believe that they had more information to make a better decision about being in a PrEP program after completing the survey intervention(baseline)
- iPrEP feasibility and acceptability as assessed by how much participant liked or disliked completing the survey(baseline)
- Number of participants with decrease in substance use(6 months)
- Number of participants with HIV seroconversion(6 months)
- Number of participants with a new sexually transmitted disease diagnosis(6 months)
- iPrEP feasibility and acceptability as assessed by how often participants relied on the survey questions being read aloud to be able to answer them(baseline)
- iPrEP feasibility and acceptability as assessed by the kind of help that participants needed from site staff in order to complete the survey(baseline)
- Number of participants with decreased high risk sex(6 months)
- iPrEP feasibility and acceptability as assessed by how participants felt about the length of the survey(baseline)
- iPrEP feasibility and acceptability as assessed by number of participants who needed help from site staff in order to complete the survey(baseline)