Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01617161
NCT01617161
Active, Not Recruiting
N/A

Prostate Advanced Radiation Technologies Investigating Quality of Life (PARTIQoL): A Phase III Randomized Clinical Trial of Proton Therapy vs IMRT for Low or Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer

Massachusetts General Hospital26 sites in 1 country454 target enrollmentJuly 25, 2012

Overview

Phase
N/A
Intervention
Proton Beam Therapy
Conditions
Prostate Cancer
Sponsor
Massachusetts General Hospital
Enrollment
454
Locations
26
Primary Endpoint
Efficacy of PBT vs. IMRT
Status
Active, Not Recruiting
Last Updated
8 days ago

Overview

Brief Summary

We are studying whether men being treated for prostate cancer have the same amount of side effects from either one of two different external radiation treatments: IMRT or PBT. With IMRT, a number of x-ray beams are used to shape the radiation to the prostate. PBT is another type of external radiation treatment for prostate cancer that is used in a few centers in the United States. Protons are tiny particles with positive charge that can be controlled to travel a certain distance and stop. PBT is precise like IMRT, but it uses proton beams instead of x-ray beams.

IMRT and PBT aim to deliver most of the radiation to the prostate cancer while sparing surrounding tissues. Both IMRT and PBT have been used in the treatment of prostate cancer and are thought to be equally effective at curing prostate cancer. However, both treatments have also been shown to cause the potential side effects of radiation, including bowel, urinary and erectile problems. It is possible that side effect rates with PBT will be lower, the same, or even higher than with IMRT, but this has not been studied well to date. Though both of these radiation therapies have been used in the past to treat prostate cancer, there has never been a study that compares the effects of these two therapies to see which one has less side effects.

In this research study, we are comparing IMRT to PBT to determine which therapy best minimizes the side effects of treatment.

Detailed Description

Because no one knows which of the study options is best, you will be "randomized" into one of the study groups: IMRT or PBT. Randomization means that you are put into a group by chance, like flipping a coin. Neither you nor the research doctor will choose which group you will be in. You will have an equal chance of being placed in either group. Randomization makes the study better from a scientific point of view because it helps ensure that patients receiving IMRT and proton therapy are similar. You will be receiving only one type of radiation, either IMRT or PBT throughout your participation in the study. Before you begin radiation therapy you will have a pelvic CT scan in order to design your radiation treatment. Doctors will use information gathered from these scans to plan the best way to deliver radiation to your tumor. Both types of radiation therapy will be given once a day for 5 days (no weekends or holidays) for up to 9 weeks. Both IMRT and PBT will require that you lie on a table for less than 15 minutes to obtain your treatment. During each visit you will be asked questions about your general health and specific questions about any problems that you might be having and any medications you might be taking. You will also undergo a physical exam and complete some quality of life questionnaires. After your radiation therapy you will have follow up visits at 3,6,9,12,18,24,36,48 and 60 months.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
July 25, 2012
End Date
December 1, 2030
Last Updated
8 days ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
Male

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Jason Efstathiou

Principal Investigator

Massachusetts General Hospital

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Diagnosed with histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate based on core-biopsy within 1 year of study entry from TRUS
  • Clinical stages T1c to T2c
  • PSA \<20, within 6 months of study entry
  • Participants who are currently receiving Dutasteride (or have received it within the last 90 days) or Finasteride (or have received it within the last 30 days) must have a PSA of ≤ 10
  • Gleason score ≤6, 3 + 4 = 7, or 4 + 3 = 7
  • ECOG Performance Status 0-1 as documented within 3 months prior to study entry
  • Must have complete history and physical examination within 45 days of study entry and digital rectal examination of prostate within 180 days of study entry

Exclusion Criteria

  • Prior surgery (not including TURP), cryosurgery, radiofrequency ablation, chemotherapy or radiation for PCa
  • Prior or planned androgen deprivation or bilateral orchiectomy
  • Distant metastases, or clinically or pathologically involved lymph nodes confirmed by a CT scan within 365 days of study entry
  • Hip prosthesis, inflammatory bowel disease or connective tissue disorder such as active scleroderma or lupus
  • Individuals with a history of other malignancies are ineligible unless 1) they have been disease-free for at least 5 years OR 2) are deemed by the investigator to be at low risk for recurrence of that malignancy with no plans for adjuvant systemic chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy and have received overall principal investigator approval.
  • Individuals who have AIDS (CD4 \< 200 or an AIDS-defining illness) or are HIV positive and not on HAART therapy are ineligible.
  • Major medical or psychiatric illness
  • Individuals with any of the following conditions are excluded from this study:
  • Unstable angina and/or congestive heart failure requiring hospitalization within the last 6 months.
  • Transmural myocardial infarction within the last 6 months.

Arms & Interventions

PBT

Proton Beam Therapy

Intervention: Proton Beam Therapy

IMRT

Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy

Intervention: Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Efficacy of PBT vs. IMRT

Time Frame: 2 years

Compare the reduction in mean EPIC bowel scores for men with low or low-intermediate risk PCa treated with PBT versus IMRT at 24 months following radiation (where higher scores represent better outcomes)

Secondary Outcomes

  • Disease Specific Quality of Life(2 years)
  • Radiation Dose and Bowel, Urinary and Erectile Function(2 years)
  • Long Term Survival(10 years)
  • Cost Effectiveness of PBT vs. IMRT(2 years)
  • Identification and Evaluation Biomarkers of PCa Behavior(2 years)

Study Sites (26)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials