MedPath

Comparison of Current Subgingival Debridement Methods

Completed
Conditions
Treatment of Periodontitis
Guided Biofilm Therapy
Subgingival Plaque
Subgingival Debridement
Registration Number
NCT06835452
Lead Sponsor
Hacettepe University
Brief Summary

Our study aimed to compare the effectiveness of current subgingival debridement methods used in the treatment of Stage 1 and Stage 2 periodontitis patients, the aesthetic condition achieved after these treatments, and the pain felt during treatment.

90 female patients who were diagnosed with chronic periodontitis (Stage 1-2) and required supra-subgingival scaling for treatment purposes, and who volunteered to participate in the study, were included in the study. Three treatment groups were determined. 30 people were included in each group. Periodontal examination was performed before and after the treatments in the 1st month, 3rd month and 6th month and the data on the collected periodontal parameters were analyzed.

Detailed Description

Periodontal parametreler Gingival index, plaque index, periodontal pocket depth and bleeding index on probing.

It was evaluated with the visual analog scale for pain and aesthetics.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
90
Inclusion Criteria
  • Systemically healthy patient (without known chronic disease)
  • Periodontal diagnostic data (Gingival Index, Plaque Index, Periodontal pocket depths, Attachment loss, Radiological data-Bone loss data) are complete
  • Treatments diagnosed with stage 1-2 periodontitis and those who have not had periodontal treatment in the last 6 months
Exclusion Criteria
  • Having a systemic disease
  • Pregnant and lactating women
  • smoker
  • Those who do not want to participate in the study

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Gingival indexbaseline, 1st month, 3rd month and 6th month

4 surfaces of all teeth (distal, buccal, mesial, lingual) are evaluated 0= Normal gingiva

1. Mild inflammation - slight discoloration, slight edema. There is no bleeding after probing.

2. Moderate inflammation - redness, edema and shine. Bleeding after probing.

3. Severe inflammation - marked redness and edema. Ulceration. Tendency to spontaneous bleeding.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Nigde Omer Halisdemir University

🇹🇷

Niğde, Turkey

Nigde Omer Halisdemir University
🇹🇷Niğde, Turkey

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.