Comparison of Current Subgingival Debridement Methods
- Conditions
- Treatment of PeriodontitisGuided Biofilm TherapySubgingival PlaqueSubgingival Debridement
- Registration Number
- NCT06835452
- Lead Sponsor
- Hacettepe University
- Brief Summary
Our study aimed to compare the effectiveness of current subgingival debridement methods used in the treatment of Stage 1 and Stage 2 periodontitis patients, the aesthetic condition achieved after these treatments, and the pain felt during treatment.
90 female patients who were diagnosed with chronic periodontitis (Stage 1-2) and required supra-subgingival scaling for treatment purposes, and who volunteered to participate in the study, were included in the study. Three treatment groups were determined. 30 people were included in each group. Periodontal examination was performed before and after the treatments in the 1st month, 3rd month and 6th month and the data on the collected periodontal parameters were analyzed.
- Detailed Description
Periodontal parametreler Gingival index, plaque index, periodontal pocket depth and bleeding index on probing.
It was evaluated with the visual analog scale for pain and aesthetics.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 90
- Systemically healthy patient (without known chronic disease)
- Periodontal diagnostic data (Gingival Index, Plaque Index, Periodontal pocket depths, Attachment loss, Radiological data-Bone loss data) are complete
- Treatments diagnosed with stage 1-2 periodontitis and those who have not had periodontal treatment in the last 6 months
- Having a systemic disease
- Pregnant and lactating women
- smoker
- Those who do not want to participate in the study
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Gingival index baseline, 1st month, 3rd month and 6th month 4 surfaces of all teeth (distal, buccal, mesial, lingual) are evaluated 0= Normal gingiva
1. Mild inflammation - slight discoloration, slight edema. There is no bleeding after probing.
2. Moderate inflammation - redness, edema and shine. Bleeding after probing.
3. Severe inflammation - marked redness and edema. Ulceration. Tendency to spontaneous bleeding.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Nigde Omer Halisdemir University
🇹🇷Niğde, Turkey
Nigde Omer Halisdemir University🇹🇷Niğde, Turkey