MedPath

Alternative Gingival De-Epithelialization Techniques

Not Applicable
Conditions
Recession, Gingival
Wound Heal
Surgical Procedure, Unspecified
Graft Complication
Interventions
Procedure: Mucotome
Procedure: Diamond Bur
Procedure: Surgical Blade
Registration Number
NCT05947305
Lead Sponsor
University of Michigan
Brief Summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare different de-epithelialization methods in patients undergoing soft tissue augmentation surgery. The main questions it aims to answer are:

• Which technique is superior for de-epithelialization in terms of remaining epithelium, wound healing of the donor site, and clinical outcomes?

Detailed Description

Participants will be randomly assigned to one of four surgical techniques during their surgical procedure and the wound site will be assessed on post-operative days 1, 7, 14, and 21.

Researchers will compare the use of mucotome, Er:YAG laser, surgical diamond bur, or blade to observe patterns of wound healing and assess if one method is superior in terms of removing the epithelium.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
48
Inclusion Criteria
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification I or II
  • Subjects undergoing periodontal surgical procedures that involve harvesting of soft tissue samples, who have a treatment plan including the use or removal of keratinized mucosa or subepithelial connective tissue that will not require additional anesthesia for sample collection
  • Adequate physical and mental health to undergo routine dental treatment
  • Ability and willingness to follow instructions related to the study procedures
Exclusion Criteria
  • Poorly controlled diabetes, defined as HbA1c >/= 7.0
  • Autoimmune or inflammatory conditions such as systemic lupus erythematous, rheumatoid arthritis.
  • Pregnant women or nursing mothers, or unsure of pregnancy status (self-reported)
  • Severe hematologic disorders, such as leukemia or hemophilia
  • Subjects on anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy
  • Local or systemic infection that may interfere with healing
  • Hepatic or renal diseases
  • Currently under cancer treatment or within 18 months from completion of radio- or chemotherapy
  • History of antibiotic or immunosuppressant use in the last 3 months
  • Subjects on concomitant drug therapy for systemic conditions that may affect outcomes of the study
  • Current smokers (CDC definition): heavy smokers: subjects who have smoked >10 cigarettes per day within 6 months of study onset, and have smoked >100 cigarettes in their lifetime

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
MucotomeMucotomeA mucotome will be used to de-epithelialize gum tissue during the subject's regularly scheduled dental surgery.
Diamond BurDiamond BurA diamond bur will be used to de-epithelialize gum tissue during the subject's regularly scheduled dental surgery.
Surgical BladeSurgical BladeA surgical blade will be used to de-epithelialize gum tissue during the subject's regularly scheduled dental surgery.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Histomorphometric ComparisonAfter Day 0 (Baseline surgery)

Histomorphometric evaluation of the relative proportion of epithelial tissue remnants (percentage) after de-epithelialization of the CTG

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Wound healingDays 1, 7, 14, 21 (Post-operative) after surgery

Wound healing comparisons using a clinical healing index (CHI) developed by Pippi et al 2015 will be completed. The possible total score is 7 (ideal score demonstrating ideal healing = 0), with scores for each section being dichotomous (0 or 1). Parameters related to clinical inspection include: mucosal color, granulation tissue, epithelialization degree, and swelling. Palpation parameters include bleeding, pain, and suppuration.

Surgical TimeDay 0 (Baseline Surgery)

Time spent removing the epithelium (in minutes)

Patient-reported outcome measuresDays 1, 7, 14, 21 (Post-operative) after surgery

Patient-reported outcome measures regarding pain and discomfort after the procedure using a line scale (from no pain to worst pain imaginable), box scale (ranging from 0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being worst pain imaginable), and a verbal rating scale (no pain, slightly painful, moderately painful, very painful, extremely painful). The number of analgesics (along with dosage) taken during the post-operative period will be recorded.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of Michigan School of Dentistry

🇺🇸

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath