Evaluation of De-epithelized Connective Tissue Grafts and Modified Combined Approach for Connective Tissue Grafts

Not Applicable

Recruiting

• Conditions: Gingival Recession
• Interventions: Procedure: de-epithelized gingival graft; Procedure: modified combined approach

• Registration Number: NCT05717985
• Lead Sponsor: National University of Malaysia

Brief Summary

This study aims to compare the de-epithelized gingival graft (control group) and modified combined approach for connective tissue graft (test group) in patients undergoing palatal graft harvesting for mucogingival surgery in the oral cavity

Detailed Description

Harvesting a palatal mucosal tissue graft as an autologous donor for oral soft tissue augmentation is widely practiced. Tissue harvest in patients with anatomically thin phenotypes can cause significant morbidity and compromised healing process. The modified combined approach (MCA) for connective tissue grafts has the potential for faster healing and fewer postoperative complications, compared to the recommended harvesting technique of de-epithelized gingival graft (DGG). However, the modified combined approach for connective tissue grafts have yet to be extensively investigated.

This examiner-masked, randomized study aims to compare post-operative morbidity and treatment outcomes in patients undergoing modified combined approach for connective tissue graft (test group) compared to the de-epithelized gingival graft (control group) harvesting techniques in tissue augmentation.

Participants will be randomized into two groups receiving one of either modified combined approach for connective tissue graft or de-epithelized gingival graft. Collection of the study parameters will utilize both examiner-assessed, and patient reported outcomes.

The study will report on the optimum palatal mucosal graft harvesting technique in an Asian population. The findings of this study will be utilized to formulate clinical recommendations for soft tissues augmentation in this population.

Study Timeline

• Study First Submitted: 2023-01-17
• Study First Submitted QC: 2023-02-06
• Study First Posted: 2023-02-08
• Study Start: 2023-02-22
• Status Verified: 2024-11
• Last Update Submitted: 2024-11-27
• Last Update Posted: 2024-12-02
• Primary Completion: 2025-06
• Study Completion: 2025-09

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: RECRUITING
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 36

Inclusion Criteria

Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

• subjects with periodontal diseases;
• subjects with poor oral hygiene of >30% plaque index;
• pregnant or lactating females;
• subjects taking medication with any known effect on the periodontal soft tissues;
• subjects with pathology in the oral cavity causing any degree of pain;
• subjects wearing removable or fixed prothesis that is in contact with the donor site an
• those with allergies to painkillers including ibuprofen and paracetamol.

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
de-epithelized gingival graft	de-epithelized gingival graft	A type of mucogingival surgery where a gingival graft is harvested from the palate, prepared chairside and placed on a recipient site to augment it. Dressing material and sutures is placed at the donor site.
modified combined approach	modified combined approach	A type of mucogingival surgery where a gingival graft is harvested from the palate, prepared chairside and placed on a recipient site to augment it. A part of the prepared tissues namely the epithelial layer is replaced at the donor site and sutured.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Pain after gingival graft harvesting	up to 3 months after surgery	Measured using a self-reported questionnaire that is designed by the research group. The pain will be measured using a visual analogue score (minimum value=0 and maximum value=10), and using a surrogate measure of amount of painkillers taken by the participants after the surgery (minimum value= 0, maximum value= 2 grams for paracetamol, 1200 mg for ibuprofen). Higher score on the visual analogue scale and higher amount of painkillers taken is a worst outcome.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Healing after gingival graft harvesting	up to 3 months after surgery	Measured clinically by the investigators. The donor site will be inspected and scored using the Wound Healing Index (Landry et. al, 1988). The photograph of the donor site will also be taken and analysed digitally to measure the amount of keratinisation using the ImageJ Software. Higher score on the Wound Healing Index is a better outcome (minimum score= 0, maximum score= 5). Higher amount of keratinised tissue as measured by the software is a better outcome (minimum value= 0, maximum value= the full surface of the donor site estimated at 3200 square mm).

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Faculty of Dentistry; 🇲🇾 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia