MedPath

Reducing Free Sugar Intakes: A Role for Sweet Taste II

Not Applicable
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Dietary Behaviour
Interventions
Behavioral: Dietary Advice
Registration Number
NCT05932329
Lead Sponsor
Bournemouth University
Brief Summary

This randomised controlled trial aims to assess the effects of three different types of dietary advice for reducing free sugar intakes, on intakes of free sugar, in a sample of the UK population.

Detailed Description

The primary objective of this randomised controlled trial is to assess the effects of three different types of dietary advice, for reducing total energy intakes (TEI) of free sugars. A total of 150 participants (age 18-65 years) consuming diets \>5% total energy intake from dietary free sugars will be recruited from across the Dorset region. All participants will be asked to reduce their free sugar intake to \<5% TEI, and to aid with this, they will be encouraged to reduce their intakes of specific foods identified as high in free sugars. Participants will also be advised to replace these foods with other foods dependent on their taste. Participants will be randomised to replace high sugar foods with: 1) foods that are low in sugars, but high in sweet taste; 2) food that are low in sugars, but high in other tastes; and 3) foods that are low in taste. The primary outcome will be changes in free sugar consumption from baseline to endpoint at week 4. Secondary outcomes will include change in: BMI; dietary profiles; sweetness preference; sweetness liking; food choices; low calorie sweetened food intakes and adherence levels at week 4.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
150
Inclusion Criteria
  1. aged 18-65 years;
  2. able to provide consent and complete all study materials;
  3. consuming >5% of TEI from free sugars;
  4. residing in the South of England, and able to attend Bournemouth University for testing.
Exclusion Criteria
  1. individuals who are pregnant or breastfeeding;
  2. underweight (BMI <18.5);
  3. have pre-existing clinical conditions such as diabetes mellitus, eating disorders, Crohn's disease and other illness's leading to participants receiving external nutritional advice and dietary restrictions;
  4. have pre-existing medical conditions affecting swallow ability, taste and smell perception;
  5. currently following a specific dietary programme (e.g.: Slimming World);
  6. current smokers or have smoked within 3 months of the study start date.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Sweet TasteDietary AdviceThe intervention will be provided to participants in written form, in an opaque sealed envelope.
TasteDietary AdviceThe intervention will be provided to participants in written form, in an opaque sealed envelope.
No TasteDietary AdviceThe intervention will be provided to participants in written form, in an opaque sealed envelope.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
AdherenceBaseline to week 4

Adherence to the recommendations provided, assessed using diet diaries and self-reported adherence

Free sugar intakesBaseline to week 4

Percentage energy intake from free sugars, assessed using diet diaries

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
BMIBaseline to week 4

BMI, in kg/m2, assessed using researcher measurements

Waist circumferenceBaseline to week 4

Waist circumference, in cm, assessed using researcher measurements

Body fat percentageBaseline to week 4

Body fat percentage, assessed using bioimpedence, as conducted by the researcher measurements

Sweet food attitudesBaseline to week 4

Attitudes towards sugar, sweeteners, and sweet-tasting foods, assessed using a questionnaire, soon to be published. Higher scores denote stronger attitudes.

Eating-based attitudesBaseline to week 4

Attitudes towards eating, assessed using the Three Factor Eating Questionnaire (Karlsson J, et al. IJO 2000; 24: 1715-1725)

Dietary IntakesBaseline to week 4

Nutrient composition and taste of dietary intakes, assessed using diet diaries

Sweet food intakesBaseline to week 4

Selection of sweet foods/fluids at a given meal, assessed where participants can consume freely from a meal composed of sweet and non-sweet foods, and proportion of sweet foods consumed is measured in terms of weight consumed

Subjective Quality of LifeBaseline to week 4

Quality of Life, measured using the SF-36 questionnaire (Ware et al, 1996), where Quality of Life is assessed out of 100, where a higher score demonstrates better quality of life

Barriers and facilitators to successBaseline to week 4

An assessment of barriers and facilitators to success, assessed by self-report questionnaire

Sweet food preferencesBaseline to week 4

Preferences for various sweet foods/fluids, assessed using a taste test, where participants sample several sweet and non-sweet foods and rate them for pleasantness on a 100mm Visual Analogue Scale. Higher scores signify stronger preferences

Sweet food perceptionsBaseline to week 4

Perceptions of the strength of sweet taste for various sweet foods/fluids, assessed using a taste test, where participants sample several sweet and non-sweet foods and rate them for strength of taste on a 100mm Visual Analogue Scale. Higher scores signify stronger perceptions

Adverse eventsBaseline to week 4

Adverse events, assessed by self-report

Body weightBaseline to week 4

Body weight, in kg, assessed using researcher measurements

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Bournemouth University

🇬🇧

Bournemouth, US And Canada Only, United Kingdom

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath