MedPath

TO COMPARE THE EFFICACY OFINTRAOPERATIVE ERECTOR SPINAE BLOCK VERSUS SKIN INFILTRATION FOR POST OPERATIVE PAIN RELIEF IN SPINE SURGERIES

Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Other symptoms and signs involvingthe nervous and musculoskeletal systems,
Registration Number
CTRI/2018/10/016120
Lead Sponsor
Ganga Hospital
Brief Summary

A prospective double blinded randomised control study to compare the efficacy of erector spinae block versus subcutaneous infiltration in patient undergong thoracolumbar surgeries.

patients will get either landmark guided erector spinae block or subcutaneous infiltration using 0.25%bupivacaine on either side of incision line at the end of surgery.

Postoperative pain assessment using VAS score and duration of the pain relief will be recorded and the total consumption of opioid.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
Not Yet Recruiting
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
80
Inclusion Criteria

Elective spine fusion surgery ASA I, II No neurological deficit.

Exclusion Criteria

Fracture spine patient Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus Neurological deficit.

Study & Design

Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
VAS SCOREVAS Score every 2 hour for 24 hours | Duration Of Analgesia upto 24hours
DURATION OF ANALGESIAVAS Score every 2 hour for 24 hours | Duration Of Analgesia upto 24hours
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Consumption Of OpioidConsumption Of Opioid over 24hours

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Ganga Hospital

🇮🇳

Coimbatore, TAMIL NADU, India

Ganga Hospital
🇮🇳Coimbatore, TAMIL NADU, India
DR J BALAVENKAT
Principal investigator
9842245757
drvipingoel@gmail.com

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.