Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT00481156
NCT00481156CompletedPhase 3

Functional Neuroimaging Effects of Cognitive Remediation Training

University of Minnesota1 site in 1 country30 target enrollmentStarted: March 1, 2005Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Phase 3
Status
Completed
Enrollment
30
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Working Memory performance

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to examine behavioral and functional brain changes occuring as a result of cognitive remediation training in patients with schizophrenia. Extension and specificity of related changes will also be examined.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Basic Science
Masking
Single (Participant)

Masking Description

Participants were randomized to computer-based cognitive training or active social-skills groups. Healthy controls (n=9) received no treatment.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 55 Years (Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder
  • •Stable outpatient

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Current drug abuse or dependence
  • •History of neurological damage, disorder, or disease

Arms & Interventions

Patients: Cognitive Remediation

Experimental

Patients in the cognitive REM condition attended up to 25 h of training in small groups over 4-6 weeks based on the approach to cognitive remediation described by Wexler and Bell (2005). Patients performed tasks designed to train attention and memory from the battery available within a computerized software package (CogPack Marker Software). This training protocol has been shown to improve memory and executive functioning in patients with schizophrenia (Sartory et al, 2005) and tasks chosen were designed to produce improved working memory and attention capacity in the treated group. In addition, patients in the REM group trained on the word N-back one to two times a week and on N-back tasks using a variety of other stimuli (such as faces) one to two times a week to support the generalization of working memory improvements.

Intervention: Cognitive Remediation (Behavioral)

Patients: Cognitive-Behavioral Social Skills Training

Active Comparator

Patients in the CBSST group also attended up to 25 h of treatment but followed a manualized group therapy protocol (Granholm et al, 2005) using cognitive and behavioral therapy methods to increase patients' skills in symptom recognition, communication, problem solving, and relapse prevention. In both conditions, the facilitators interacted with the clients throughout small group (B4 patients) sessions: in the REM group, this mostly involved brief one-on-one discussions regarding task performance; in the CBSST condition, this interaction was in the context of the group milieu.

Intervention: Cognitive Behavioral Social Skills Training (Behavioral)

Controls: Retest control group

Other

Estimate of normal brain functioning and retest effects

Intervention: Retest in Health Controls (Other)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Working Memory performance

Time Frame: Post-test

N-Back Performance

Brain activation

Time Frame: Post-test

Changes in prefrontal cortical functioning

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials