MedPath

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF BLIND TRACHEAL INTUBATIONVIA TWO SUPRAGLOTTIC AIRWAY DEVICE

Phase 4
Active, not recruiting
Conditions
Medical and Surgical,
Registration Number
CTRI/2022/01/039817
Lead Sponsor
Dr Rajan Verma
Brief Summary

Airway management is most important skill an anaesthetist has to acquire. However the latest LMAs are suitable alternative through which blind tracheal intubation can be attempted and which do not require expertise. Therefore we are comparing the efficacy of two different LMAs that is the fastrach LMA and the blockbuster LMA for their overall efficacy and success rate of blind tracheal intubation

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
Closed to Recruitment of Participants
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
70
Inclusion Criteria

ASA grade 1&2 MPG 1&2.

Exclusion Criteria

Pregnant patients Patients with oropharyngeal pathology.

Study & Design

Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
2. Time taken for blind tracheal intubation2 weeks
1. Time taken for LMA insertion2 weeks
3.Overall success rate of blind tracheal intubation2 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
To assess the change in hemodynamicsTo assess any complications during insertion or removal of LMA or any post operative complications.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Guru Nanak Dev Hospital

🇮🇳

Amritsar, PUNJAB, India

Guru Nanak Dev Hospital
🇮🇳Amritsar, PUNJAB, India
Arshdeep Singh
Principal investigator
8447981110
drarshdeep95@gmail.com

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.