Sensitivity, Specificity, and Positive and Negative Predictive Values of Automatic Office Blood Pressure Measurement and Traditional Office Blood Pressure Measurement in a Chinese Population
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 149
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- compare BP readings from AOBPs, ABPM, and traditional office BP
研究概览
简要总结
Background: Traditional office blood pressure (BP) measurement is often inaccurate and is inferior to out-of-office measurements, such as ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), in predicting cardiovascular outcomes. A relatively new BP measurement method, called Automatic Office Blood Pressure measurement (AOBP), may provide similar BP readings to ABPM (latest clinical gold standard for BP measurements) and can easily be conducted in clinics. AOBP machines measure BP repeatedly 3-5 times with 1-min intervals and automatically provide the mean BP value. While AOBP was used in landmark trials (e.g. SPRINT trial) and was shown to eliminate white-coat effect, AOBP is rarely used in Hong Kong partly because there is no data concerning the accuracy of AOBP in Chinese. Almost all previous AOBP research used BpTRU (AOBP model), but BpTRU manufacturer was shut down permanently.
Aim: To assess if WatchBP Office (another AOBP model) has superior diagnostic accuracy than traditional office BP measurements, when compared to ABPM readings.
Method: 150 Chinese adult patients with a diagnosis of essential hypertension will be recruited consecutively from a Government-funded primary care clinic. All patients will have their BP measured by a 48-hour ABPM, a WatchBP office, and two traditional office blood pressure measurements.
ABPM will be considered the gold standard; sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of AOBP and traditional BP to diagnose elevated BP level, masked hypertension and white-coat hypertension will be calculated and compared
Implication: if WatchBP provides closer BP readings to ABPM, this can lead to its implementation in routine clinical practice
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Other
- 时间视角
- Prospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •diagnosis of essential hypertension
排除标准
- •(i) severe hypertension as defined by clinical systolic BP ≥180 mmHg and/or diastolic BP ≥110 mmHg (because they may need emergency treatment and it is unethical to delay such treatment due to the proposed project), (ii) inability to provide consent, (iii) pregnancy, (iv) night-time occupations (we need to compare AOBP and clinic BP readings to daytime ABPM average when the patient should be awake), (v) are occupational drivers (because potential dangers in driving could occur when patients are asked to remain still), (vi) receiving anti-coagulants (to prevent bruises when using ABPM), (vii) with known atrial fibrillation (as ABPMs and AOBP use have not been validated in this group)
结局指标
主要结局
compare BP readings from AOBPs, ABPM, and traditional office BP
时间窗: 1 year
mean difference of systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) between AOBP machines (WatchBP Office, BpTRU)/office BP and daytime ABPM will be compared by the two-tailed t-test; A Bland-Altman type plot will be shown for both comparisons. Pearson correlations will be used to compare mean readings of office BP, AOBP and daytime ABPM.
次要结局
- sensitivity/specificity, positive and negative predictive value of AOBP vs traditional BP measurement(1 year)
研究者
Lee Kam Pui
Assistant Professor
Chinese University of Hong Kong