Insulin Scheme for Glycemic Control in Non-critical Hospitalized Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in the Context of a Health System in Mexico.
Overview
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Intervention
- NPH insulin
- Conditions
- Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
- Sponsor
- Universidad de Guanajuato
- Enrollment
- 75
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Differences in the Mean Daily Blood Glucose Between a Basal-bolus Scheme and NPH Schemes of Insulin.
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 4 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The aim of the study is to determine differences in glycemic control between a basal-bolus scheme insulin and NPH scheme insulin in a population of hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes in a Noncritical Care Facility in Mexico. Patients with a recent diagnosis of type 2 and patients on treatment with oral hypoglycaemic agents and insulin or only insulin were included.
The primary outcome of the study is to determine difference in efficacy and security between a basal-bolus scheme insulin and NPH scheme insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes hospitalized in non-critical areas in a hospital in Mexico
Detailed Description
On the first 4 to 6 h, the use of NPH insulin present a pronounced action peak on the postprandial glucose metabolism, and the rest of its basal action last 12 to 18 h, its cover the postprandial requirements of the first two meals of the day (breakfast and lunch) administering 2/3 of the total dose, and the requirements for the dinner with 1/3 of the total dose at the night. This is considered a good scheme for handling hyperglycemia, and its possible to have less hypoglycemia episodes, which are possible if an ultra-rapid-acting insulin is added and adequate intake is not performed due to multiple factors related to hospitalization. Today it is uncertain whether there is any clear benefit of using Glargine plus Lantus insulin over NPH insulin in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes. Currently, both Glargine and NPH based regimen is practiced in inpatient hospital facilities. Current practice of inpatient insulin regimen is based on the physicians familiarity with a particular insulin type and personal preference rather than evidenced based knowledge. Glargine plus ultrafast insulin are two types of insulin that are more expensive compared to NPH with incidental benefits in hospitalized patients. There are reports in the literature about the incidence of hypoglycemia with this scheme. The current research proposal is to compare these two schemes in the treatment of hospitalized patients with diabetes in a hospital of the second level of care in Mexico.
Investigators
Jose Antonio de Jesus Alvarez Canales
PhD
Universidad de Guanajuato
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Patients between 18 and 100 years old.
- •History of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) or that upon admission is diagnosed by values of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1) \> 6.5%
- •Fasting central glucose before randomization between 140mg/dl and 400mg/dl
- •Non-critical patients hospitalized in the service of Internal Medicine (MI), General Surgery (CG) and Traumatology (TyO).
- •Patients receiving a diabetic diet orally
- •Treated with diet alone, o any combination of oral anti-diabetic agents or insulin treatment with any dosage before admission.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Parenteral nutrition
- •Hyperglycemia without a known history of diabetes
- •Impaired renal function (glomerular filtration rate less than 30)
- •Diabetic ketoacidosis and hyperosmolar state
- •Type 1 Diabetes mellitus
- •Pregnancy
- •Patients on treatment with more than 10mg prednisone or steroid boluses.
- •Known hypopituitarism or adrenal insufficiency
- •Hyperglycaemia due to stress (negative antecedent of DM2, hyperglycemia and HbA1 \<6.5)
- •Severe liver disease (Child-Pugh C score)
Arms & Interventions
NPH insulin group
Patients receiving NPH twice daily, 2/3 in the morning and 1/3 in the night. A correctional dose of lispro insulin will be given for any blood glucose \>180 mg/dL. If subjects were not eating, they shouldn't receive dose of NPH insulin. Intervention Drug: NPH insulin
Intervention: NPH insulin
Glargine and Lispro insulin group
Half of the total of Glargine and Lispro insulin dose will be given as glargine once daily, either in the morning or in the evening, depending on when the patient was enrolled. The other half of the total daily insulin dose will be given as Lispro; doses were divided equally for breakfast, lunch, and dinner. An additional correctional dose of Lispro will be given for any blood glucose \>180 mg/dL. If subjects were not eating, they received glargine once daily and they shouldn't receive doses of lispro. Intervention drug: Glargine and Lispro
Intervention: Glargine and Lispro insulin
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Differences in the Mean Daily Blood Glucose Between a Basal-bolus Scheme and NPH Schemes of Insulin.
Time Frame: Fasting blood glucose was taken every day, before breakfast, up to 4 weeks; postprandial glucose was taken every day, 2 hours after breakfast, 2 hours after lunch, and 2 hours after dinner, up to 4 weeks; glucose early morning was taken 3 am, up to 4 week
To determine the differences in the mean daily blood glucose measured in mg/dl, between a basal-bolus scheme and NPH schemes of insulin measured by the mean daily blood glucose.
Secondary Outcomes
- Number of Participants With Sustained Glycemic Control During Hospital Stay(blood glucose was taken every day, up to 4 weeks.)
- the Number of Participants With Mild and Severe Hypoglycemic Events(Duration of hospital stay, up to 4 weeks.)