Engaging Surrogates and Physicians to Ensure Concordant Critical Care
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Completed
- Sponsor
- Johns Hopkins University
- Enrollment
- 116
- Locations
- 2
- Primary Endpoint
- Presence of acceptable treatment option as assessed by a checklist completed by clinical colleges.
Study Overview
Brief Summary
A no-cost intervention may improve adherence with a recommendation for higher-quality, lower-cost care for patients with critical illness endorsed by a collaborative of critical care societies. The investigators propose prompting consideration of functional outcomes. This trial will help establish the impact of the intervention on practice patterns including proxy engagement and elements of shared decision-making.
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Health Services Research
- Masking
- Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 25 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria
- •Licensed physicians
- •At least 4 weeks of clinical work in an I.C.U. in the U.S.A. during the past 12 months
Exclusion Criteria
- •<25 years old
- •Non-English speaking
- •Primarily practicing medicine outside the U.S.A.
Arms & Interventions
Control
Prompts standard to rounds or electronic medical records.
Prompting Intervention
Prompting consideration of 3-month functional outcome.
Intervention: Consideration of 3-month functional prognosis (Behavioral)
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Presence of acceptable treatment option as assessed by a checklist completed by clinical colleges.
Time Frame: 0 to 5 minutes after prompting an intervention
Secondary Outcomes
- Level of conflict with proxy with a previously validated single question(0 to 5 minutes after prompting an intervention)
- Level of shared decision-making measured using CollaboRATE scale(0 to 5 minutes after prompting an intervention)
- Medical interactions assessed using the Roter Interaction Analysis System (RIAS)(0 to 5 minutes after prompting an intervention)
- Prevalence of the discussed option of stopping life support as assessed by blinded assessors(0 to 5 minutes after prompting an intervention)
- Prevalence of conveying prognosis as assessed by blinded assessors(0 to 5 minutes after prompting an intervention)
- Prevalence of communication skills for involving ICU proxies in treatment decisions assessed by a checklist completed by clinical colleges(0 to 5 minutes after prompting an intervention)
- Level of shared decision-making measured using CollaboRATE scale as assessed by blinded assessors(0 to 5 minutes after prompting an intervention)
- The Observer OPTIONS5 measure completed by blinded assessors(0 to 5 minutes after prompting an intervention)
- Consulting services requested by study participants(0 to 5 minutes after prompting an intervention)
