Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05993195
NCT05993195CompletedNot Applicable

Comparative Analysis of Re-operation Rates of Concorde Bullet Device Versus Conduit Titanium Interbody Graft for Lumbar Fusion

Lahey Clinic1 site in 1 country100 target enrollmentStarted: March 12, 2021Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
100
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Reoperation rate

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this early study is to compare the clinical results of the new Conduit Interbody device to the traditional Concorde Bullet Device. The primary objective is to explore the rates and reasons for re-operation between both constructs at 2 years.

Detailed Description

The demand for lumbar fusion continues to rise with the growing and aging population. Additionally, new and innovative technologies continue to bring new devices to the market. However, our understanding of how emerging constructs compare with existing technology is lacking. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical results of the new Conduit Interbody device to the traditional Concorde Bullet Device in lumbar fusion, one or two levels between L2-S1 will be included. Both transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) approaches will be included in the patient cohort. The primary objective is to explore the rates and reasons for re-operation between both constructs at 2 years.

Study Design

Study Type
Observational
Observational Model
Cohort
Time Perspective
Retrospective

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients aged 18 or older with symptomatic degenerative lumbar spondylotic disease, either spondylosis, and/or spondylolisthesis
  • who have failed conservative management of at least 6 weeks requiring 1 or 2 level lumbar interbody fusion (either PLIF or TLIF)
  • All patients included will be index surgeries (no re-operations).

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients who improve with consecutive management and do not undergo lumbar fusion surgery
  • Surgery performed in the thoracic or cervical spine
  • Surgery performed for tumor, infection, or trauma Patients who have an unstable fracture, tumor, and osteoporosis with T score exceeding -2.0

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Reoperation rate

Time Frame: 1 year and at 2 years

a comparison of Concorde Bullet Device versus Conduit Titanium Interbody Graft for lumbar fusion in terms of reoperation rate

Secondary Outcomes

  • Surgical Variables of Concorde Bullet Device versus Conduit Titanium Interbody Graft for lumber fusion(2 years)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials