Effect of Septal Versus Apical Pacing- a Comparative Study Using Cardiac MRI

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Ventricular Dysfunction; Ventricular Remodelling
• Interventions: Procedure: Apical pacing; Procedure: Septal pacing; Device: Pacemaker

• Registration Number: NCT01842243
• Lead Sponsor: Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust

Brief Summary

Despite considerable effort the optimal site to place a pacemaker lead at the time of pacemaker implant remains unclear. Historically pacemaker leads have always been inserted at the bottom (apex) of the heart. It is suggested that a lead placed at the apex is associated with an increase in heart rhythm problems and also heart failure (impaired pumping function). The top of the ventricle (septum) has been investigated as an alternative site and is now routinely used by some centres. Previous estimation of the hearts pumping function (ejection fraction) has been limited to the use of echo (sound waves). Echo is not sensitive enough to detect small changes in the ejection fraction reliably (measure of pumping function of heart). The gold standard for measurement of ejection fraction is MRI (using magnets). Previous pacemakers have not been compatible with MRI scans. The latest generation of pacemakers are now able to be safely scanned within an MRI scanner. This allows a much more accurate estimation of the effects of a pacemaker on the ejection fraction which has not yet been studied.

The investigators plan to study those patients undergoing a pacemaker implant and ablation procedure as part of their standard care.

Individuals will have an exercise test, blood test used to measure biomarkers and fill in a symptom questionnaire.

Individuals will have a Cardiac MR compatible pacemaker fitted and 2 ventricular leads will be inserted, one apically and one septally. Only one lead will be used at any given time. Individuals will then undergo their planned AV node ablation.

Following this they will have a cardiac MR scan. Further MRI scans will be performed at 9 and 18 month intervals, as will symptom questionnaires, blood tests (BNP) to determine heart muscle strain, exercise testing and echocardiograms.

The hypothesis is that a lead placed on the septum will produce superior cardiac performance over the short and long term.

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2012-02
• Status Verified: 2013-01
• Study First Submitted: 2013-04-24
• Study First Submitted QC: 2013-04-26
• Study First Posted: 2013-04-29
• Primary Completion: 2015-12-31
• Study Completion: 2015-12-31
• Last Update Submitted: 2019-02-01
• Last Update Posted: 2019-02-04

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 53

Inclusion Criteria

• Patients in permanent Atrial Fibrillation (AF)requiring a pacemaker on clinical grounds (tachycardia/bradycardia syndrome or requiring an AV node ablation)and AV node ablation or a pacemaker for rate control)
• Patients aged 18 to 85 years old.
• Able to consent for study.

Exclusion Criteria

• Patients with moderate to severe LV dysfunction (EF < 40%).
• Any contraindication to an MRI scan.
• Patients indicated for an Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator or Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy.
• Patients with a Myocardial Infarction within three months prior to enrollment.
• Patients that received bypass surgery within three months prior to enrollment.
• Patients that had a valve replacement within three months prior to enrollment or patients with a mechanical right heart valve.
• Patients where a right ventricular lead cannot be placed e.g. complex congenital heart disease.
• Patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.
• Patients with acute coronary syndrome, unstable angina, severe mitral regurgitation and/or haemodynamically significant aortic stenosis.
• Previous implanted pacemaker or cardioverter defibrillator.
• Terminal conditions with a life expectancy of less than two years.
• Participation in any other study that would confound the results of this study.
• Psychological or emotional problems that may interfere with the volunteer's ability to provide full consent or fully understand the purposes of the study.
• Pregnant patients or patients who may become pregnant during the time-scale of the study.

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: CROSSOVER

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Apical Pacing	Apical pacing	Pacemaker programmed to pacing the heart at apex for 9 months.
Apical Pacing	Pacemaker	Pacemaker programmed to pacing the heart at apex for 9 months.
Septal Pacing	Pacemaker	Pacemaker programmed to pacing the heart at the septum for 9 months.
Septal Pacing	Apical pacing	Pacemaker programmed to pacing the heart at the septum for 9 months.
Septal Pacing	Septal pacing	Pacemaker programmed to pacing the heart at the septum for 9 months.
Apical Pacing	Septal pacing	Pacemaker programmed to pacing the heart at apex for 9 months.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Ventricular Ejection fraction	18 months	Comparison of % change in Left and Right Ventricular Ejection Fractions between apical and septal pacing groups as measured on MRI.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Levels of BNP	18 months	Blood Sampling
6 minute walk tests	18 months
Level of Pro-BNP	18 months	Blood sampling
Exercise Capacity as measured by CPEX	18 months
Level of MMP-1	18 months	Blood sampling
Level of Troponin	18 months	Blood sampling
Level of MMP2	18 months	Blood sampling
Quality of life measures SF36	18 months
Level of ICTP	18 months	Blood sampling
Level of MMP-9	18 months	Blood sampling
MRI measures of Left and Right ventricular dyssynchrony	18 months
Level of GDF-15	18 months	Blood sampling

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University Hospital of South Manchester NHS trust; 🇬🇧 Manchester, United Kingdom