Comparison of Guided Imagery and Virtual Reality (VR) Technology on Patient and Parent Coping and Resource Utilization During Unsedated Procedures
Overview
- Phase
- N/A
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Chronic Illness
- Sponsor
- Medical College of Wisconsin
- Enrollment
- 67
- Locations
- 2
- Primary Endpoint
- GI vs. VR in patient anxiety via STAI-State Post-Intervention
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 4 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
Children with acute and chronic illness undergo frequent, painful, and distressing procedures. This randomized control trial was used to evaluate the effectiveness of guided imagery (GI) vs virtual reality (VR) on the procedural pain and state anxiety of children and young adults undergoing un-sedated procedures. We explored the role of trait anxiety and pain catastrophizing in intervention response.
Detailed Description
Treatment for pediatric cancer and blood disorders can range from several months to several years. During the course of treatment, children often undergo several painful and/or frightening procedures. Common unsedated procedures include needle access of an implanted central venous port (i.e., "port access") prior to receiving chemotherapy; intravenous needle sticks to provide chronic transfusion therapy or treatment for iron overload in patients with sickle cell disease; and weekly changing of the bandage (dressing) around a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC). These procedures are often distressing to a pediatric patient. As a result, there is an emphasis on the use of non-pharmacologic interventions to manage symptoms of patient pain and anxiety for procedures that do not warrant pharmacologic intervention. There is also ample evidence to suggest that parental coping is associated with child distress, which highlights the need for interventions that have the potential to decrease parental, as well as patient, distress. Interventions that are cost-effective and sustainable are most appealing in the current healthcare environment. Non-immersive distraction, such as guided imagery, is widely regarded as useful in decreasing pain and anxiety during procedures. Guided imagery is a cognitive strategy that typically involves a staff member describing in detail a situation that is incompatible with the experience of pain and is meant to invoke feelings of calm. It is a commonly used intervention to address procedural distress and, aside from staff time, is free of cost. However, that the more distracting the stimuli, the greater the expenditure of cognitive energy, and the greater reduction in one's capacity to process pain and feel distressed. This leads one to question whether VR, an immersive, interactive technology that can realistically project three-dimensional images, may be more effective than a non-immersive distraction in managing procedure-related pain and distress. VR has been used to assist with procedural distress in several contexts over the past 15 years, including pediatric pain, burn care, dental procedures, and port access. Reviews of VR usage have been generally positive, with most studies suggesting that VR is a feasible and efficacious method of distraction that can reduce patient-reported and objective physiological measures of pain and distress. Effect sizes in the medium to the large range have been found when comparing VR to standard of care and non-immersive distraction (e.g., videogames), have found that subjects using VR distraction for pain showed more improvement than approximately 83% of control subjects. Other sources have highlighted positive patient satisfaction and a low incidence of negative side effects (e.g., motion sickness) when using VR. The cost of VR equipment has decreased over the years, although VR headsets still average $300-500 with additional cost for game controllers and smartphones/game systems. For use within a hospital, the further cost would need to be incurred to reduce the risk of infection for equipment that is shared. Using a comparative effectiveness model, this project will compare a low-cost, but widely accepted non-immersive distraction intervention (guided imagery) to a higher cost, but very promising immersive intervention (VR) in managing patient pain and anxiety, as well as parent distress. To our knowledge, this is the first time these two interventions will be directly compared. It is also the first time that parental distress will be measured as an outcome of a VR intervention. Hospital resource utilization (staff time, facility usage) will be evaluated as an additional cost/benefit aspect of the intervention.
Investigators
Jennifer Hoag
Associate Professor of Pediatrics
Medical College of Wisconsin
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Individuals being seen by the hematology, oncology, and blood and marrow transplant services.
- •English-speaking patients between the ages of 8-25 years that are at least one month post-diagnosis.
- •Has one of the three qualifying procedures: port access, dressing changes, and IV sticks.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Patients having identified physical impairments (e.g., blindness, active infection of the skin, history of seizure disorder) that would prevent them from using VR equipment.
- •Patients with significant developmental delays that would prevent them from completing required study forms.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
GI vs. VR in patient anxiety via STAI-State Post-Intervention
Time Frame: STAI-State will be completed 10 minutes after the first and second intervention (GI and VR).
GI will be compared to VR when it comes to the STAI-State. This assessment is used to assess a patient's state (in the moment) anxiety. There is only one version for all ages.
GI vs. VR in patient pain via the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Time Frame: The PCS will be completed by the patient 10 minutes before the first procedure or intervention (i.e., at baseline).
GI will be compared to VR when it comes to the Pain Catastrophizing Scale for Children (PCS) to identify subgroups that may respond better to one intervention over another. Patient perceptions of pain will be assessed prior to the first procedure using either the child (for patients 8-16 years) or adult (for patients 17+ years) version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). The PCS is a 13-question survey which assesses thoughts and feelings related to pain on a 5 point scale ranging from "not at all" to "extremely."
GI vs. VR in patient pain via Children's Emotional Manifestation of Pain Scale (CEMS)
Time Frame: The CEMS will be completed by study staff during each intervention. Study staff will assess the patients through the duration of the procedure and intervention that same day.
GI will be compared to VR when it comes to the Children's Emotional Manifestation of Pain (CEMS). This observational measure offers an objective way to measure distress during difficult medical experiences. It includes the following domains: anxiety score, facial expression, vocalization, activity, interaction, and level of cooperation.
GI vs. VR in patient pain via the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: The VAS will be completed by the patient within 10 minutes after completion of each intervention (i.e., GI and VR intervention).
GI will be compared to VR when it comes to the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). This measure is used to assess pain and distress across 6 domains: (1) highest level of pain, (2) average amount of pain, (3) anxiety about pain, (4) unpleasantness of pain, (5) bothersomeness of pain, and (6) time spent thinking about pain. Scores range from 0-100 on each item.
GI vs. VR in patient anxiety via State Trait Anxiety Inventory - Trait (STAI-T)
Time Frame: The STAI-T will be completed by the patient 10 minutes before the first procedure or intervention (i.e., at baseline).
GI will be compared to VR when it comes to the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Trait (STAI-T) to identify subgroups that may respond better to one intervention over another. This measure is used to assess a patient's trait (underlying or baseline) anxiety. There is a child portion for patients 8-16 years or an adult portion for patients 17+ years.
GI vs. VR in patient anxiety via STAI-State Pre-Intervention
Time Frame: STAI-State will be completed 10 minutes prior to the first and second procedure (GI and VR).
GI will be compared to VR when it comes to the STAI-State. This assessment is used to assess a patient's state (in the moment) anxiety. There is only one version for all ages.
Secondary Outcomes
- Nurse Feasibility and Acceptability(The Nurse Feasibility and Acceptability survey will be completed within one day following completion of each intervention.)
- GI vs VR in hospital resource utilization via Procedure Time(The Procedure Time log is completed by a member of the study team. The time begins once the nursing staff member opens the sterile kit used for the current procedure and ends when the procedure is completed/)
- GI vs. VR in parent distress via Emotional Adjective Survey(The Emotion Adjective Survey will be completed by the caregiver 10 minutes after each intervention.)
- GI vs VR in hospital resource utilization via Staff Time(The Staff Time log is completed by a member of the study team. It begins once the nursing staff member opens the sterile kit used for the current procedure and ends when the procedure is completed after each intervention.)
- GI vs. VR in parent distress via PCS-P(The PCS-P will be completed by the caregiver 10 minutes before the first procedure or intervention.)