MedPath

Predicting Outcomes of GPOEM Using Gastric Electrical Mapping

Recruiting
Conditions
Gastroparesis
Registration Number
NCT06381349
Lead Sponsor
Chris Varghese
Brief Summary

Gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy (GPOEM) is a minimally-invasive procedure that involves dividing the pylorus, to enhance gastric emptying in gastroparesis patients. This is a single-arm, multi-centre, prospective observational study to determine the clinical utility of Gastric Alimetry in predicting GPOEM treatment outcomes. The investigators further aim to develop a clinical decision rule to inform patient selection. Gastric Alimetry will be conducted \<1 month prior to GPOEM. All subjects will then be followed up for 12 months.

Detailed Description

This protocol proposes no change to the clinical management of patients which is left to the discretion of the patients' primary clinical team.

Patients as part of this study will undergo a baseline assessment via Gastric Alimetry, and concurrent symptom, quality of life, and health psychology questions.

GPOEM will be performed as per standard site protocol, with data captured in RDCap.

Patients will be followed up at 1-month, 3-month, 6-months, and 12-months using the myCap (REDCap) app.

Participants and clinicians can opt-in for a repeat Gastric Alimetry test at 6 or 12 months following their GPOEM procedure.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
300
Inclusion Criteria
  • Aged 18 years or older
  • Indicated for GPOEM
Exclusion Criteria
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding
  • Inability to perform Gastric Alimetry test: history of severe skin allergies or sensitivity to cosmetics or lotions; chronically damaged or vulnerable epigastric skin (fragile skin, wounds, inflammation); patients unable to remain in a relaxed reclined position for the test duration.

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI)6 months

≥ 1 decrease in total GCSI score \[higher score = worse symptoms\]

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Patient Assessment of Upper GastroIntestinal Disorders-Quality of Life (PAGI-QoL)1, 3, 6, and 12 months

0 - 5; higher score = better quality of life

Patient Health Questionnaire - 8 (PHQ-8)6, and 12 months

0 - 12; higher score being increased depression severity

Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI)12 months

0-100%; higher scores indicating increased loss of work productivity and activity impairment

EQ-5D scores1, 3, 6, and 12 months

0 - 1; higher score being better quality of life

Patient assessment of upper gastrointestinal disorders-symptom severity index (PAGI-SYM)1, 3, 6, and 12 months

0 - 1; higher score being increased symptom burden

Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7)6, and 12 months

0 - 21; higher score indicates increased anxiety

Perceived Stress Scale 4 (PSS-4)6, and 12 months

0 - 16; higher scores indicate higher stress

Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire-Revised6, and 12 months

0 - 80; higher scores indicate worse illness perception

Alimetry® Gut-Brain Wellbeing (AGBW)1, 3, 6, and 12 months

0 - 40; higher scores indicate higher mental health burden

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

University of Auckland

🇳🇿

Auckland, New Zealand

University of Auckland
🇳🇿Auckland, New Zealand
Chris Varghese, MBChB
Contact
+64 (0) 9 923 9820
cvar706@aucklanduni.ac.nz

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.