Positive Affect and Mental Imagery in the Process of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy

Not Applicable

• Conditions: Mental Disorders

• Registration Number: NCT03767101
• Lead Sponsor: Ulrike Willutzki

Brief Summary

Background: Research findings suggested that people with mental disorders show a dysfunctional upregulation of negative affect (NA) but at the same time a dysfunctional downregulation of positive affect (PA) as distinct processes. Nevertheless, established treatment approaches focus on the modification of problems and negative affect only. Experimental paradigms with healthy and subclinical populations showed that PA inductions lead to higher flexibility in information processing, cognitive appraisal and action tendencies. Higher amounts of PA were associated with more personal resources, higher psychological resilience and subjective well-being. Preliminary evidence indicated that a focus on positive and functional aspects in the life of patients lead to better treatment sessions and outcome. However, the role of PA for the process in cognitive behavioral therapy remains unclear.

Method/Design: In regard to this we developed the PACIfIC-study, serving the following objectives:

(1) to explore the trajectories of PA and NA and their association with relevant process variables in an early phase of CBT treatment. (2) To develop and test the feasibility of a brief and easily implementable intervention to promote PA in psychotherapy sessions. (3) To analyze the impact of this intervention on the therapeutic process between and within CBT sessions and intermediate outcomes.

The study includes a randomized contolled, longitudinal design in an outpatient research and treatment center. Both a process and an intervention analysis will be conducted. In the process analysis, we will examine the course of PA and NA in the first twelve sessions of CBT treatments. In the intervention analysis, we will examine the effects of a six-minute positive mental imagery intervention during an early phase of psychotherapy. The aim of this micro-intervention is to foster patients' in-session PA, which may lead to increased levels of subjective resources, resilience, and self-esteem (theory-driven outcome) as well as improvements in psychopathology and working alliance (secondary outcome).

Discussion: The study results may have important theoretical and practical implications on the use of PA in psychotherapeutic treatment. Furthermore an economic implementation of strengths-oriented interventions in psychotherapy practice may be initiated.

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2018-11-02
• Study First Submitted: 2018-11-26
• Study First Submitted QC: 2018-12-05
• Study First Posted: 2018-12-06
• Status Verified: 2021-12
• Last Update Submitted: 2021-12-27
• Last Update Posted: 2022-01-13
• Primary Completion: 2022-12
• Study Completion: 2023-03

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: UNKNOWN
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 120

Inclusion Criteria

• at least one mental disorder according to DSM-5 criteria
• treatment at the center of Mental Health and Psychotherapy, Witten/Herdecke University; outpatients clinic

Exclusion Criteria

• current diagnosis of a severe episode of major depressive disorder
• suffering from a psychotic disorder
• suffering from substance use disorder
• current episode of (hypo)mania
• current suicidal risk
• extensive experiences with guided mental imagery intervention
• insufficient German language skills
• currently receiving another psychological treatment

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Witten Resource Questionnaire (WIRF) -change measurement-	Baseline, mid-4 (after four weeks), mid-8 (after eight weeks), post-12 (after twelve weeks of treatment)	Outcome of the intervention analysis. Self-report of psychosocial resources \[subscale with 12 items\]. A total score will be computed with averaged item scores (range: 0-5).
Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-Risc) -change measurement-	Baseline, mid-4 (after four weeks), mid-8 (after eight weeks), post-12 (after twelve weeks of treatment)	Outcome of the intervention analysis. Internationally used self-report of psychological resilience \[short version: 10 items\]. A total score will be computed with averaged item scores (range: 1-7).
Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) -session questionnaire-	Baseline; measured once per week for twelve weeks of treatment, directly after each session	Outcome of the process analysis. International used self-report of positive and negative affect \[20 items\]. Participants will be asked to rate the items according to how they feel "in the current moment". Two subscales of global positive affect (ten items, range: 1-5) and global negative affect (10 items, range: 1-5) will be used separately. Subscale scores will be computed with averaged item scores.
Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale (RSES) -change measurement-	Baseline, mid-4 (after four weeks), mid-8 (after eight weeks), post-12 (after twelve weeks of treatment)	Outcome of the intervention analysis. Internationally used self-report of general self-esteem \[10 items\]. A total score will be computed with summed item scores (range: 0-30).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Working Alliance Inventory - Short Revised (WAI-SR) -change measurement-	Baseline, mid-4 (after four weeks), mid-8 (after eight weeks), post-12 (after twelve weeks of treatment)	Outcome of the intervention analysis. Internationally used self-report of therapeutic alliance measuring bond, goals and tasks in psychotherapy based on feedback of patients concerning the current therapy session \[12 items\].
Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) -change measurement-	Baseline, mid-4 (after four weeks), mid-8 (after eight weeks), post-12 (after twelve weeks of treatment)	Outcome of the intervention analysis. Internationally used self-report of symptom severity of patients \[53 items\].

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Witten/Herdecke University; 🇩🇪 Witten, North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany