MedPath

Effects of Myofascial Trigger Point Dry Cupping on Plantar Heel Pain

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Heel Spur Syndrome
Chronic Plantar Fasciitis
Plantar Fasciitis
Interventions
Device: Dry cupping
Other: Stretching exercises
Registration Number
NCT02895698
Lead Sponsor
Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University
Brief Summary

The main aim of this study is to investigate the effects of dry cupping on calf muscle trigger points in patients with plantar heel pain. A secondary aim is to examine the correlation between several outcome measures in those patients.

Detailed Description

Plantar heel pain is a condition often seen by healthcare providers. It is presented as pain and tenderness under the heel with weight bearing activities. Approximately 15% of athletic and non-athletic adults who have foot complaints seek professional care for plantar heel pain. There are different names and definitions for this condition in the literature such as plantar heel pain, plantar fasciitis, plantar fasciosis, plantar fasciopathy, heel spur syndrome, and jogger's heel. The reason for inconsistency in defining the condition is due to disagreement on the underlying pathology. A number of conditions may result in plantar heel pain, namely plantar fasciitis (most common), calcaneus fracture, heel fat pad atrophy, and peripheral nerve dysfunction. Recently, several studies have shown that myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) or tender points in the calf muscles may be associated with plantar heel pain. Many studies have determined risk factors in the development of plantar heel pain, classifying them as either intrinsic or extrinsic. Intrinsic risk factors comprise the anatomical (ROM of the ankle and subtalar joints position) or demographic characteristics of the individual (age, gender, weight and height). Extrinsic risk factors are related mainly to the subject's activity environment, such as running on a hard surface, time spent weight bearing, and previous injury. All these factors lead to an increase in the mechanical load on the foot, specifically the plantar fascia. Treatment of plantar heel pain usually targets the plantar fascia or other structures in the plantar heel area using several interventions such as cortisone injection, therapeutic ultrasound, laser, ice, heel pads, and night splints. Evidence varies regarding the effectiveness of these interventions.

The main aim of this study is to investigate the immediate and carry-over effects of dry cupping on calf muscle trigger points on pain and function in patients with plantar heel pain.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
70
Inclusion Criteria
  • Unilateral plantar heel pain.
  • Trigger point(s) in the gastrocnemius/soleus muscle(s).
  • Central or centro-medial tenderness in the plantar aspect of the heel.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Red flags: tumor, fracture, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoporosis, or any severe vascular condition in the lower limbs.
  • Neurological symptoms: sciatica, tarsal tunnel syndrome.
  • Previous surgery in the affected leg below the hip.
  • Fibromyalgia.
  • Previous manual therapy treatment for the same condition within the past 6 months.
  • History of more than three corticosteroid injections within the past year.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Treatment groupDry cuppingDry cupping + active dorsiflexion exercise + stretching exercise
Control groupStretching exercisesstretching exercise + active dorsiflexion without cupping
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Visual analogue scale (VAS)Change from Baseline in VAS at 2 days post intervention

* A self-reporting scale.

* The scale is presented as a 10-cm horizontal line on which the participant pain intensity is represented by a point between the two ends: one end is labelled no pain, and the other end is labelled worst pain imaginable.

Morning first steps visual analogue scaleChange from Baseline in morning visual Analog Scale at 2 days post intervention

* A self-reporting scale.

* The scale is presented as a 10-cm horizontal line on which the participant pain intensity is represented by a point between the two ends: one end is labelled no pain, and the other end is labelled worst pain imaginable.

Pressure pain threshold (PPT)Change from Baseline in PPT at 2 days post intervention

* The PPT was measured with an electronic algometer.

* Pressure was applied at a rate of 40 kPa/s, and participants pressed a switch when the sensation changed from pressure only to pressure and pain.

Ankle plantar flexion strengthChange from Baseline in ankle plantar flexion strength at 2 days post intervention

Ankle plantar flexion strength was assessed by asking the participant to perform as many single-leg heel rises as possible in standing at a rate of one every 2 seconds, and the examiner counted the repetitions.

The patient-specific functional scale (PSFS)Change from Baseline in PSFS at 2 days post intervention

* A clinical outcome measure that allows participant to state their own functional status.

* The examiner asked the participant about three important activities that they were unable to do or had difficulty doing. The participants rated their level of function on a scale starting from 0, which is the lowest functional level, and 10, which is the highest level of function.

Ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (ROM)Change from Baseline in ankle dorsiflexion ROM at 2 days post intervention

* An inclinometer was used to measure the ROM of ankle dorsiflexion.

* The participant stands in a calf-stretch position, with knee extended or knee flexed (modified lunge position) then to move forward until the heel starts to rise or to maximum stretch. Then the examiner measured the range of motion.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath