Comparison of McGrath Videolaryngoscope, Pentax Airway Scope and Macintosh Laryngoscope in Manikin by Novice
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Intubation
- Interventions
- Other: Macintosh laryngoscopyOther: McGrath videolaryngoscopyOther: Pentax videolaryngoscopy
- Registration Number
- NCT03161730
- Lead Sponsor
- Ajou University School of Medicine
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the intubation time and success rate between videolaryngoscopes (McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope, Pentax Airway Scope) and Macintosh laryngoscope in tracheal intubation in a normal and cervical immobilized manikin by novice airway managers.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 35
Inclusion Criteria
- nurse without experience in tracheal intubation
Exclusion Criteria
- refusal to consent
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Macintosh laryngoscopy Macintosh laryngoscopy Participants attempt to perform three intubation using Macintosh laryngoscope in the manikin with the normal airway and difficult airway scenario, respectively. McGrath videolaryngoscopy McGrath videolaryngoscopy Participants attempt to perform three intubation using McGrath videolaryngoscope in the manikin with the normal airway and difficult airway scenario, respectively. Pentax videolaryngoscopy Pentax videolaryngoscopy Participants attempt to perform three intubation using Pentax videolaryngoscope in the manikin with the normal airway and difficult airway scenario, respectively.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method intubation time within 2 min after insertion of laryngoscope into manikin's mouth time the blade passed the manikin's tooth until lung expansion with resuscitation bag
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Jong Yeop Kim
🇰🇷Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, Korea, Republic of