MedPath

Comparison of McGrath Videolaryngoscope, Pentax Airway Scope and Macintosh Laryngoscope in Manikin by Novice

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Intubation
Interventions
Other: Macintosh laryngoscopy
Other: McGrath videolaryngoscopy
Other: Pentax videolaryngoscopy
Registration Number
NCT03161730
Lead Sponsor
Ajou University School of Medicine
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the intubation time and success rate between videolaryngoscopes (McGrath MAC videolaryngoscope, Pentax Airway Scope) and Macintosh laryngoscope in tracheal intubation in a normal and cervical immobilized manikin by novice airway managers.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
35
Inclusion Criteria
  • nurse without experience in tracheal intubation
Exclusion Criteria
  • refusal to consent

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Macintosh laryngoscopyMacintosh laryngoscopyParticipants attempt to perform three intubation using Macintosh laryngoscope in the manikin with the normal airway and difficult airway scenario, respectively.
McGrath videolaryngoscopyMcGrath videolaryngoscopyParticipants attempt to perform three intubation using McGrath videolaryngoscope in the manikin with the normal airway and difficult airway scenario, respectively.
Pentax videolaryngoscopyPentax videolaryngoscopyParticipants attempt to perform three intubation using Pentax videolaryngoscope in the manikin with the normal airway and difficult airway scenario, respectively.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
intubation timewithin 2 min after insertion of laryngoscope into manikin's mouth

time the blade passed the manikin's tooth until lung expansion with resuscitation bag

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Jong Yeop Kim

🇰🇷

Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, Korea, Republic of

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath