跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03401983
NCT03401983已完成不适用

Effectiveness of Pelvic Floor Muscle and Abdominal Training in Women With Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Randomized Controlled Study

Trakya University0 个研究点目标入组 64 人开始时间: 2016年9月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
64
主要终点
Change from baseline pelvic floor muscle strength at 8 weeks

研究概览

简要总结

The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle and abdominal training in reproductive-age patients with stress urinary incontinence.

This prospective randomized controlled design study included 64 female patients aged 18-49 years with stress urinary incontinence. The patients were divided into 2 groups (32 PFMT "Pelvic Floor Muscle Training" and 32 PFMT+AT "Abdominal Training") by computer-based randomization. The stress urinary incontinence type was assessed by a stress test, and the pelvic floor muscle strength was measured with a home biofeedback device. Voiding functions were assessed by a 3-day voiding diary and uroflowmetric test. The UDI-6 scale was used to assess the urinary symptoms, and the IIQ-7 scale was used to assess the quality of life. The follow-up measurements of both groups were obtained in the 0th, 4th, and 8th weeks.

详细描述

The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle and abdominal training in reproductive-age patients with stress urinary incontinence.

This prospective randomized controlled design study included 64 female patients aged 18-49 years with stress urinary incontinence. The patients were divided into 2 groups (32 PFMT "Pelvic Floor Muscle Training" and 32 PFMT+AT "Abdominal Training") by computer-based randomization. The stress urinary incontinence type was assessed by a stress test, and the pelvic floor muscle strength was measured with a home biofeedback device. Voiding functions were assessed by a 3-day voiding diary and uroflowmetric test. The UDI-6 scale was used to assess the urinary symptoms, and the IIQ-7 scale was used to assess the quality of life. The follow-up measurements of both groups were obtained in the 0th, 4th, and 8th weeks.

Participation of 29 patients from each group in the study was determined as sufficient to test the two-way hypothesis, with an effect size of 0.75, with an alpha level of 0.05, and with a power of 80%. However, 32 patients from each group were included as a precaution against possible missing data.

These women were randomly divided into the PFMT+AT (n=32) and PFMT (n=32) groups using a computer based randomization scheme. The data were collected from both groups at the 0th, 4th, and 8th weeks.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Supportive Care
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 49 Years(Adult)
性别
Female
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 未提供

排除标准

  • 未提供

研究组 & 干预措施

PFMT + AT

Experimental

Pelvic Floor Muscle Training and Abdominal Training

干预措施: Pelvic Floor Muscle Training and Abdominal Training (Other)

PFMT

Active Comparator

Pelvic Floor Muscle Training

干预措施: Pelvic Floor Muscle Training (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Change from baseline pelvic floor muscle strength at 8 weeks

时间窗: 0th, 4th, and 8th weeks.

Pelvic floor muscle strength was measured using a perineometry device

次要结局

  • Change from baseline UDI-6 score at 8 weeks(0th, 4th, and 8th weeks.)
  • Change from baseline IIQ-7 score at 8 weeks(0th, 4th, and 8th weeks)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Hatice Kahyaoglu Sut

Head of Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Nursing

Trakya University

相似试验

Effectiveness of Pelvic Floor Muscle and Abdominal... | 临床试验