Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01638806
NCT01638806
Terminated
Not Applicable

Acute Versus Subacute Angioplasty in Patients With NON-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NON-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction=NONSTEMI Trial)

Aarhus University Hospital Skejby1 site in 1 country500 target enrollmentJune 2012

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Myocardial Infarction
Sponsor
Aarhus University Hospital Skejby
Enrollment
500
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Mortality
Status
Terminated
Last Updated
7 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are categorized according to the electrocardiogram (ECG) findings into: 1) patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI), 2) patients with Bundle Branch Block Myocardial Infarction (BBBMI), and 3) remaining patients with so-called NON-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NONSTEMI).

Patients with STEMI or BBBMI are treated with acute angioplasty (PPCI=primary percutaneous coronary intervention), and the sooner PPCI is performed the lower is the mortality. This is why prehospital diagnosis and field-triage of patients with STEMI directly to heart centers with PPCI facilities is recommended.

In patients with NONSTEMI previous trials have indicated that early angioplasty, within 72 hours of symptom onset, is associated with improved outcome when compared to late angioplasty or conservative therapy. No trials have so far been able to diagnose patients with NONSTEMI in the prehospital phase or immediately on arrival at a hospital, and triage them directly to PPCI. Implementation of point-of-care (POC) testing of biomarkers may enable prehospital or early inhospital establishment of the diagnosis NONSTEMI.

The aim of the present trial is to identify patients with NONSTEMI in the prehospital phase or immediately on arrival at the local hospital based on a) symptoms, b) POC testing and c) ECG findings and then randomize patients to I) PPCI, or II) medical therapy and angiography/angioplasty within 72 hours (todays routine).

Se below for detailed description

Detailed Description

In the present trial patients with a) typical angina pectoris (AP) combined with b1) rise in biomarkers on POC testing (prehospital/immediately inhospital) and/or b2) ST-segment depression of more than 0.2 mV in two contiguous leads or more than 0.1 mV in four contiguous leads are randomized to I) PPCI (same protocol as in STEMI patients) or II) medical therapy and angiography/angioplasty within 72 hours (todays routine practice). The primary purposes of the present trial is threefold: 1. To evaluate if it is possible to diagnose patients with NONSTEMI in the prehospital phase or immediately on arrival at the hospital (N=250 patients) 2. To compare a combined endpoint of mortality, re-infarction (during index admission or readmitted), or readmission with Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) between group I (PPCI strategy) and group II (routine strategy) (N=2500 patients). 3. To compare mortality between group I and II (N=4500 patients). Secondary purposes of the present trial is: 1. To evaluate whether there is difference in the primary endpoints in patients randomized within or after 12 hours of symptom onset. 2. To evaluate whether there is difference in the primary endpoints in patients randomized in the prehospital phase and on admission to the hospital, respectively. 3. To evaluate whether there is difference in the primary endpoints in patients with a final diagnosis of AMI, as adjudicated by a clinical event committee. 4. To evaluate whether there is difference in the primary endpoints in patients with or without diabetes, respectively. 5. To compare a combined endpoint of mortality, readmission with AMI, readmission with CHF, readmission with AP, revascularization (not planned on index admission). 6. To compare a combined safety endpoint of stroke or serious bleeding between group I and II. 7. To evaluate if there is difference in the frequency of PCI and CABG in group I versus II. 8. To compare total admission time between group I and II. 9. To compare total cost between group I and II. 10. To compare total duration where the patient is on sick leave between group I and II

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
June 2012
End Date
April 2017
Last Updated
7 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Aarhus University Hospital Skejby
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Christian Juhl Terkelsen

Associate professor, MD, PhD

Aarhus University Hospital Skejby

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Elevated biomarkers (Point-of-care testing) either prehospital or immediately on admission
  • ST-segment depression of 0.2mV or more in two contiguous leads or 0.1 mV or more in four contiguous leads.
  • Patient can be randomized either in the prehospital phase or within 30 minutes of admission to a hospital

Exclusion Criteria

  • Tachycardia \> 120
  • Age \< 18 or \> 80 years
  • Indication for PPCI already fulfilled
  • Patient cannot understand the study information
  • Presumed "troponisme"
  • Left ventricular hypertrophy
  • Known dialysis
  • Previous CABG
  • Pregnancy

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Mortality

Time Frame: within 1 year from randomization

all-cause mortality

Re-infarction

Time Frame: within 1 year from randomization

Re-infarction (during index admission or readmitted) adjudicated by and endpoint committee. The endpoint committee is blinded to the initial randomization. The "Universal definition of Myocadial infarction" will be used to classify reinfarction. Biomarkers will be recorded with emphasis on the need of obtaining blood samples until a peak has been reached during index hospitaltization before reinfarction can be considered. Re-infarction will require a 20% relative rise in biomarker level.

Readmission with CHF

Time Frame: within 1 year from randomization

Readmission or visit in the outpatient clinic with CHF. Readmission or visit with CHF needs to be adjudicated by an endpoint committee blinded to the initial randomization.

Confirmed AMI

Time Frame: during index admission

An endpoint committee needs to evaluate whether each patient had AMI on the index admission. This evaluation is performed without the endpoint committee being aware whether the patient was randomized to PPCI or conventional therapy. The endpoint committee will classify whether the patient had: a) NONSTEMI, b) STEMI with symptom duration \<=12 hours, c) STEMI with symptom duration \>12 hours, d) BBBMI with symptom duration \<=12 hours or e) BBBMI with symptom duration \> 12 hours.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Readmission with AP(within 3 months, 1 year, and 5 year from randomization)
  • Readmission with stroke(within 3 months, 1 year, and 5 year from randomization)
  • Non-scheduled re-intervention(within 3 months, 1 year, and 5 year from randomization)
  • Duration of index admission(Time from initial admission to discharge)
  • Sick-leave from work(within 3 months, 1 year, and 5 year from randomization)
  • Total cost(within 3 months, 1 year, and 5 year from randomization)
  • Bleeding(within 3 months, 1 year, and 5 year from randomization)
  • Time to intervention(Time from ambulance call to PCI or CABG is performed or angiography is performed without indication for PCI or CABG)
  • Cardiovascular mortality(within 3 months, 1 year, and 5 year from randomization)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials