EFFECTS OF IRRIGATION NEEDLES WITH DIFFERENT DESIGNS USED DURING ENDODONTIC TREATMENT ON POSTOPERATIVE PAIN

In this study, the mandibular molars of patients aged 18-65 who were diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis and underwent root canal treatment at the Endodontics Clinic of Akdeniz University Faculty of Dentistry between January 2023 and January 2024 were included. Postoperative pain assessment forms obtained during the routine follow-up of the patients were included in the study.The study included patients who underwent routine root canal treatment procedures at the Endodontics clinic of Akdeniz University Faculty of Dentistry, where the treatments were performed by a single dentist. The age, gender, systemic diseases, root canal structure, periapical condition, irrigation needle design used during endodontic treatment, and pre- and post-treatment pain severity of the patients included in the study were obtained from patient records and follow-up forms.

Before the procedure, the patients' medical and dental histories were taken, and preoperative pain levels were recorded. Each patient received an inferior alveolar nerve block using a 2 ml local anesthetic solution (Ultracain D-S forte, Sanofi, France) containing 80 mg articaine hydrochloride and 0.024 mg epinephrine hydrochloride. After the teeth related to the rubber dam were isolated, caries and any existing restorations were removed using diamond burs, and a standard endodontic access cavity was prepared.

For canal length determination, #10 K-type (Perfect, China) hand files were used, and the working length was determined with an electronic apex locator (Woodpecker, Endo Radar Pro, China) and confirmed radiologically.

Root canal preparation was performed using an endodontic motor (Woodpecker, Endo Radar Pro, China) and a nickel-titanium rotary instrument system (Scope Endodontic System, Turkey) at a speed of 300 rpm and a torque of 2 N/cm. Apical preparation was completed to a size three larger. During shaping, at the point where apical resistance was encountered, excessive torsional loading was prevented by removing the files from the canal, cleaning the debris from the files, and irrigating the root canals.

During the shaping process, the root canals were rinsed with 2 ml of 2.5% NaOCl after each file change and recapitulated with a #10K file. After the root canal preparation procedure was completed, each canal was rinsed with 5 ml of 2.5% NaOCl, and the NaOCl solution was activated using an endoactivator in three 20-second cycles. 5 ml of distilled water was applied to remove NaOCl residues from the canal. Then, 2 ml of 17% EDTA (Endo-Solution, Cerkamed, Stalowa Wola, Poland) was applied for 1 minute. To neutralize the EDTA residues, each canal was finally irrigated with 5 ml of distilled water.