A Observational study to compare applications of artificial intelligence and anesthesiologist decision making in the selection of anesthesia techniques
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 143
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Concordance rate between AI suggested anaesthesia techniques and anesthesiologist selected techniques for the given surgical procedure and patient profile
研究概览
简要总结
This study compares anesthesia technique decisions made by artificial intelligence (AI) with those of anesthesiologists. It evaluates AI’s ability to provide safe, evidence-based perioperative plans across preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative care. By identifying strengths and limitations of AI, the study aims to assess its potential role in supporting clinical decision-making and improving consistency in anesthesia practice.This study compares the anesthesia method choices suggested by AI tools (ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini) with those actually selected by anesthesiologists in clinical practice.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 0.00 Day(s) 至 99.00 Year(s)（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Patients undergoing orthopaedic, neurosurgery, upper abdominal surgeries,ASA 1-4,of either sex & of all age groups.
排除标准
- •Patients preference conflicted with anesthesiologist recommendation Preferred anaesthesia method was changed during course of operation.
结局指标
主要结局
Concordance rate between AI suggested anaesthesia techniques and anesthesiologist selected techniques for the given surgical procedure and patient profile
时间窗: 1 hour after the procedure
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Annapureddy Shreya reddy
BM patil institute of medical science and research institute