Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03362320
NCT03362320
Unknown
Not Applicable

A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Arthroscopic Double- Versus Single-layer Reconstruction of the Rotator Cuff: Clinical and Radiological Outcome

Austrian Research Group for Regenerative and Orthopedic Medicine1 site in 1 country70 target enrollmentJune 18, 2015

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Rotator Cuff Tear
Sponsor
Austrian Research Group for Regenerative and Orthopedic Medicine
Enrollment
70
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Retear rate
Last Updated
5 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Retear rates after arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs remain unsatisfactorily high. Recently, attention has been paid to restore the rotator cuff's native anatomy by reconstructing the superior joint capsule. However, the debate whether to reconstruct only the superficial tendinous part or also the deeper capsulo-ligamentous part of the rotator cuff is ongoing. Thus, the intention of the present study is to compare double-layer versus single-layer arthroscopic rotator cuff repair regarding retear rate and clinical outcome.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
June 18, 2015
End Date
December 2022
Last Updated
5 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Sponsor
Austrian Research Group for Regenerative and Orthopedic Medicine
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Philipp Heuberer

Principal Investigator

Austrian Research Group for Regenerative and Orthopedic Medicine

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • patients with repairable supra- and infraspinatus tears scheduled for arthroscopic rotator cuff fixation
  • tear size of at least 2.5 cm and up to 4.0 cm
  • signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • axillary nerve palsy

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Retear rate

Time Frame: 12 months postoperatively

Comparison of re-ruptures rate evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging between groups

Secondary Outcomes

  • qDASH(baseline, 24 and 60 months postoperatively)
  • ASES(baseline, 24 and 60 months postoperatively)
  • SST(baseline and 24 months postoperatively)
  • Constant-Murley score(baseline, 24 and 60 months postoperatively)
  • Satisfaction with the procedure(24 and 60 months postoperatively)
  • SSV(baseline, 24 and 60 months postoperatively)
  • Tendon integrity(baseline and 60 months postoperatively)
  • VAS(baseline, 24 and 60 months postoperatively)
  • WORC(baseline and 24 months postoperatively)
  • Range of motion (ROM)(baseline, 24 and 60 months postoperatively)
  • SF-36(baseline, 24 and 60 months postoperatively)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials