Comparison of different methods to induce sleep in pediatric electroencephalogram recording

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Performance of diagnostic medical procedures needs patient’s cooperation that is often refused by children. The EEG procedure is especially not well tolerated by children with developmental disa; Epilepsy; Electroencephalography; Melatonin; Sleep deprivation; Chloral hydrate; Sleep onset latency; Duration of sleep

• Registration Number: TCTR20200204002
• Lead Sponsor: The Ratchadapiseksompotch Fund (RA 62/064)

Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study Completion: 2020-01-31
• Study Start: 2020-02-04
• Last Update Posted: 19 August 2024

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 45

Inclusion Criteria

-Patients whom were consulted for EEG recording at King Chulalongkorn Memorial hospital
-Age between 1-5 years or older but do not co-operate

Exclusion Criteria

-History of allergy to chloral hydrate or melatonin patients
-Patients have current respiratory infection problems or abnormal
-respiratory signs and symptoms such as dyspnea which risk to
-respiratory insufficiency
-Alteration of consciousness patients
-Patients who can not follow the sleep deprivation protocol
children nor parents factors
-Enteral feeding contraindicated patients
-Patients who have clinically seizure during the EEG performance

Study & Design

• Study Type: Interventional
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Compare the efficacy of melatonin versus melatonin and sleep deprivation versus chloral hydrate and 8 months time to sleep, duration of sleep

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Factors associated with sleep duration and sleep latency 8 months multivariate group comparison