MedPath

Running Slopes and Power Performance

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Healthy
Interventions
Other: Interval Training at 10% incline
Other: Interval Training at 1% incline
Registration Number
NCT02514330
Lead Sponsor
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
Brief Summary

The objective of the present study was to determine the effect of interval session running at high intensity with 1% or 10% gradient on the height of the drop jump. The cinematic variables concentric phase, eccentric and contact time were compared after the running session in both conditions in order to explain possible changes in the jump performance. The investigators theorize that the lower eccentric overload in the running to 10% inclination promotes higher deleterious effect on power performance of the lower limbs

Detailed Description

Physical training programs are typically composed of activities directed to the development of different valences usually stimulated in the same session. When aerobic activities of long duration prior isokinetic strength exercises, isotonic, or explosive, deleterious effects seem to be induced on performance of these valences. These short and long-term changes in muscle strength and power would be directly associated with repetitive eccentric loads that characterize the endurance running. Gradual increases in the running slope were inversely associated with a proportional reduction in the eccentric loads, which in turn would result in less muscle damage to intra and extrafusal fibers. So, the change in the slope of the race would emerge as an optional way to neutralize the competitive effect on the power performance. The research consisted of five visits. At the initial visit was conducted familiarization to vertical drop jump, and immediately after, the determination of VO2max values and their associated speed (vVO2max). The second visit was a new familiarization for the vertical drop jump followed immediately determining the Time to exhaustion performance in vVO2max (100% of VO2Max). Two jumps were performed on each of the three selected heights (20, 30 and 40 cm) were used in the experimental sessions and control only the height associated with the highest performance. In subsequent visits (third to fifth), participants performed three maximum jumps before and about 10 min after the following conditions: high intensity Interval running a 10% gradient (C10%), 1% grade (C1%) and control condition (CON).

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Male
Target Recruitment
25
Inclusion Criteria
  • age: 18 at 45 years
  • no cardiovascular or metabolic problems
  • minimum level of aerobic activity recommended by American College of Sports Medicine
Exclusion Criteria
  • no joint or muscle injuries
  • no use ergogenic or anabolic resources

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Interval Training at 10% inclineInterval Training at 10% inclineProcedure: Initial Drop Jump (20;30;40 cm), Six Stimulus of High Intensity Interval Training at 10% incline, Final Drop Jump (20;30;40 cm)
Interval Training at 1% inclineInterval Training at 1% inclineProcedure: Initial Drop Jump (20;30;40 cm), Six Stimulus of High Intensity Interval Training at 1% incline, Final Drop Jump (20;30;40 cm)
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Kinematic of Height Jumpup to 1 month

the same group (N=25) of subjects performed the experimental procedure in the last three sessions aiming to achieve the highest performance in all three conditions

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Kinematic of Concentric Phaseup to 1 month

the same group of subjects performed the experimental procedure in the last three sessions

Kinematic of Excentric Phaseup to 1 month

the same group of subjects performed the experimental procedure in the last three sessions

Kinematic of Contact Timeup to 1 month

the same group of subjects performed the experimental procedure in the last three sessions

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath