MedPath

The Chit-Chat Educational Intervention to Promote Advance Care Planning in the Community

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Old Age
Family Members
Interventions
Other: Chit-Chat
Registration Number
NCT06296719
Lead Sponsor
The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to estimate the effect size of the Chit-Chat intervention on ACP engagement among family members of older adults with multi-morbidity.

Detailed Description

After being informed about the study and potential risks, all eligible participants will be asked to provide written informed consent for study entry. At week 0, participants will be randomized in an assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial in a 1:1 ratio to received the Chit-Chat intervention (two 2-hr weekly educational sessions) or wait-list control group.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
60
Inclusion Criteria
  • age 18 or above;
  • a family member of a relative who aged 60 or above and lives with at least two severe chronic diseases such as cancer, dementia, lung, heart, liver, and renal disease.
  • they perceived themselves will take part in taking care of their relatives in the near future;
  • able to read and communicate in Cantonese.
  • they are self-reported as cognitively intact
Exclusion Criteria
  • their relatives have been referred to palliative care service before the study.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Chit-ChatChit-ChatThe Chit-Chat intervention, covering five areas, including (1) Serious illness in older adults, (2) Realities of caring and dying from a carer's perspective, (3) Introduction to the importance of advance care planning for individuals and communities, (4) Effective communication between older adults, family members, and healthcare professionals in ACP conversations (i.e. listening to the wishes and preferences of older adults regarding their needs), and (5) audience participation and clarification including questions, answers and concerns.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
ACP engagement2 Weeks; 1-month follow-up

The validated Chinese version of the ACP Engagement Survey - Surrogate Decision Maker consists of 17 items covering 4 dimensions: role cognition, contemplation, self-efficacy, and readiness. The questionnaire used a 5-point Likert scale to gather response. The total score can range between 17 and 85, with higher score indicating higher level of ACP engagement.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Knowledge of ACP2 Weeks; 1-month follow-up

The Knowledge Questionnaire consists of five items which address the purposes of ADs, EOL discussion, and issues related to ACP. The possible range of the total score is 0-5, with higher scores indicating better knowledge.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Hong Kong Polytechnic University

🇭🇰

Hong Kong, Hong Kong

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath