Evaluation of the Effects of a Cognitive-Motor Fall Prevention Program "SILVER XIII - EQUILIBRE" on Fall Risk Factors: Functional Abilities and Executive Functions
Overview
- Phase
- N/A
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Accidental Falls
- Sponsor
- EZUS-LYON 1
- Enrollment
- 176
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Change of Trail Making Test part A and B scores at Week 12 after intervention
- Status
- Active, Not Recruiting
- Last Updated
- 9 months ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The goal of this interventional study is to compare in community dwelling elderly people the effects of two physical activity programs to prevent accident falls : "SILVER XIII EQUILIBRE" program and "VIVIFRAIL" program, on several risks factors such as executive functions and functional capacities.
Participants will perform a 1 hour physical activity session during 10 weeks and effects will be measured using a multidimensional test battery. "SILVER XIII EQUILIBRE" program contains cognitive-motor exercises where participants have to perform two tasks simultaneously such as answering math questions while walking whereas "VIVIFRAIL" program contains multifactorial exercises such as walking, balance training and resistance training in single-task condition.
The main question it aims to answer is :
• Does physical activity enriched with simultaneous cognitive exercises enhances the effects ?
Detailed Description
Falls in the elderly are a problem of increasing importance in our aging societies. Among the multiple intrinsic risk factors, if the age-induced decline of functional and locomotor capacities are recognized risk factors, impaired executive functioning is another equally important one. Thus, Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) - characterized by an early deficit in executive functioning but not pathological - turns out to be an independent and significant risk factor. In order to reduce the impact of this problem and thus promote "well aging", it is essential to develop effective preventive approaches on all of these risk factors. Of these, cognitive-motor fall prevention programs - based on simultaneous cognitive and motor tasks - are the most effective in reducing the rate of falls. However, since 2017, the French Rugby League Federation has been proposing such an innovative program called "SILVER XIII - EQUILIBRE" consisting of 10 one-hour sessions per week and including a majority of cognitive-motor exercises. In addition, this program also includes exercises for learning the "play the ball", a specific skill of rugby league that consist of shooting the ball with the heel and making a step forward which is close to the stepping strategy to avoid falling. Initially intended for community dwelling elderly people and non-fallers presenting a usual aging (average age = 67.6 +/- 3 years), it turns out that this program welcomes three different profiles of elderly people that we find in the literature: (1) young-aged, active people with no deficits in functional and cognitive abilities; (2) older people with optimal cognitive aging but less active (3) older people with MCI. As the effects of regular Physical Activity (PA) depend on the initial level of each individual, it could be that the effects of the "SILVER XIII - EQUILIBRE" program on both functional abilities and executive functions depend on the profile of the elderly. In order to answer the main question the effects of the "SILVER XIII EQUILIBRE" program will be compared to an active comparator : the "VIVIFRAIL" program which is a international multifactorial program to prevent falls based on walking, balance and resistance training single task exercises.
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Older people living at home
- •Able to walk without technical assistance
Exclusion Criteria
- •Presence of a proven major neurocognitive disorder (MOCA score \< 18)
- •Patients with severe depression (Geriatric Depression Scale score \> 10)
- •Body mass index (BMI) \> 35
- •Diagnosed and known neurological or neurodegenerative pathology
- •Having declared more than 3 falls in the pas year
- •Presence of a motor disorder
- •Contraindication to the practice of a physical or sporting activity
- •Participation in another protocol for the prevention of falls or loss of autonomy in the last 6 months
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Change of Trail Making Test part A and B scores at Week 12 after intervention
Time Frame: Week 1 and Week 12
Participants will be asked to perform the Trail Making Test part A and B (Reitan, 1958) following the instructions of the evaluator. It consist of connecting by making pencil lines 25 encircled numbers randomly arranged on a page in proper order (part A) and 25 encircled numbers and letters in alternating order (part B). A sample page including only 8 circles is made for training just before each 25 circle test page. Measurements will take place one week before the first session (Week 1) and one week after the last session (Week 12). Execution time will be measured in seconds.
Change of Stroop Test Victoria version scores at Week 12 after intervention
Time Frame: Week 1 and Week 12
Participants will be asked to perform the Stroop Test Victoria version (Bayard, 2011) following the instructions of the evaluator. It consist of three pages each containing 6 lines of 4 items and each page includes an additional line for training. In the page 1 participant has to tell the color of 4 dots printed in color ink in left to right order and line by line ; in the page two 4 neutral words are printed in color ink and participants has to tell the color of the ink in the same order ; in page three 4 color words are printed in color ink and participants has to tell the color of the ink in the same order. Measurements will take place one week before the first session (Week 1) and one week after the last session (Week 12). Execution time in second and errors will be measured.
Change of walking speed at Week 12 after intervention
Time Frame: Week 1 and Week 12
Participants will perform a 6 meters gait measurement where they have to walk at self pace on a 10 meters corridor and time in second will be measured on 6 meters using photoelectric sensors. The first 2 meters are for reaching the pace and last 2 meters are to stop. Measurements will take place one week before the first session (Week 1) and one week after the last session (Week 12). Spontaneous gait speed will be measured in meters per second.
Secondary Outcomes
- Change of Choice Stepping Reaction Time at Week 12 after intervention(Week 1 and Week 12)
- Change of 2 minutes step in place test at Week 12 after intervention(Week 1 and Week 12)
- Change of one leg standing position time at Week 12 after intervention(Week 1 and Week 12)
- Sedentary behaviors at Week 1(Week 1)
- Change of 30 second sit to stand test score at Week 12 after intervention(Week 1 and Week 12)
- Change in the walking trail making test outcomes at Week 12 after intervention(Week 1 and Week 12)
- Change of dual-task walking speed at Week 12 after intervention(Week 1 and Week 12)
- Change in fall rate at Week 36 after intervention(From Week 12 to Week 36)
- Global cognition score at Week 1(Week 1)
- Fall Risk score at Week 1(Week 1)
- Common physical activity at Week 1(Week 1)