Connective Tissue Graft From Tuberosity Area and L-PRF Associated With Coronally Advanced Flap for Root Coverage
- Conditions
- Gingival Recession
- Registration Number
- NCT05783258
- Lead Sponsor
- G. d'Annunzio University
- Brief Summary
The aim of the present randomized controlled clinical study is to compare the efficacy of subepithelial connective tissue graft harvested from the maxillary retromolar tubeosity area and L-PRF membranes in the treatment of RT1 recessions by coronally advanced flap.
A total of 30 patients will be recruited and randomly assigned to the test group treated with CAF+tSCTG or the control group treated with (CAF+L-PRF). For each experimental site the parameters of gingival recession (GR), pocket depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), keratinized gingiva width (KT) and gingival thickness (GT) will be analyzed at baseline (T0) and at 12 months after the surgical procedure (T1). In addition, was also evaluated the different morbidity of the two surgical techniques, using the VAS scale values recorded in the first 2 weeks following surgery. It was checked the Patient Related Esthetic Score and Dentine hypersensivite reduction.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 30
- Presence of a class RT1 recession;
- age > 18 years;
- systemic health conditions that do not affect the periodontium;
- Non smoker;
- FMPS and FMBS values < 20% before the surgical procedure;
- absence of implants or subgingival restorations in the sites to be treated;
- presence of adequate tissue distal to the last maxillary molar.
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Gingival thickness 12 months Gingival tissue thickness 2 mm apical to the recession
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Pocket depth 12 months Distance between gingival margin and bottom of the pocket
Clinical attachment level 12 months Distance between cementoenamel junction(CEJ) and depth of the pocket
Keratinized tissue height 12 months Distance between gingival margin and Mucogingival Junction
Gingival recession 12 months Distance from cementoenamel junction and gingival margin
Complete root coverage 12 months Percentage of experimental sites that achieved complete root surface coverage.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Michele Paolantonio
🇮🇹Pescara, Italy
Michele Paolantonio🇮🇹Pescara, Italy