The Effect of a Group Intervention Program Based on Acceptance and Mindfulness on the Physical and Emotional Well-being of Overweight and Obese Individuals; Mind&Life Project
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Overweight and Obesity
- Sponsor
- University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)
- Enrollment
- 142
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Changes in the quality of life estimated by the Impact of Weight in the Quality of Life-Lite Questionnaire (IWQOL-Lite)
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 3 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
The objective of the present study is to evaluate the effect of a 20-week group intervention program based on acceptance and mindfulness in emotional eating, weight loss, physiological parameters and the level of physical exercise, as well as in the quality-of-life and weight self-stigma of overweight and obese people on the short- and medium-term.
Design, participants, and method: A randomized clinical trial comprising a total of 110 overweight or obese (BMI ≥ 25) participants that are receiving medical treatment at Primary Care Centers, 20-65 years, will be included and randomly assigned to standard program (N=55) or standard + intervention program (N=55). The standard program group will receive the treatment as usual (TAU) that comprises 5 sessions (on a monthly basis) that will include a personalized diet and physical exercise recommendations, while the standard + intervention program group will receive the same TAU plus the acceptance and mindfulness-based group intervention program.
At baseline prior to randomization, after the intervention, and seven months after the program has finished anthropometric and body composition data, biochemical data in blood, waist circumference, blood pressure, eating habits, level of physical exercise, general health, emotional eating, quality-of-life, weight self-stigma, experiential avoidance, self-compassion level and mindfulness abilities will be evaluated.
It is hypothesized that the integrated treatment of obesity implementing a group intervention program based on acceptance and mindfulness could help to reduce the emotional eating, enhance weight loss, improve physiological parameters, increase the level of physical exercise, improve the quality of life and reduce the weight self-stigma of overweight and obese individuals.
Detailed Description
The standard program group will receive the TAU that comprises 5 monthly sessions of 30 minutes that will include a personalized diet and physical exercise recommendations. The standard + intervention program group will receive the same TAU plus the acceptance and mindfulness-based group intervention program. The first ten sessions will be held weekly and the last five, biweekly. The duration of sessions will be 2 hours and will include a mindfulness practice, the session content (i.e. control as the problem, willingness, etc.), followed by a mindful eating practice to train the ability to pay attention to food and eating physical sensations. Finally, the session content will be briefly revised and practices for the week will be established. The following measurements will be evaluated at baseline prior to randomization, after the intervention, and seven months after the program has finished: anthropometric and body composition data, that is, weight and fat and muscle mass percentage (Bio-electrical Impedance Analysis, TANITA) and height (SECA 227); biochemical data in blood; waist circumference (Holtain inelastic tape); blood pressure; eating habits (24h recall and PREDIMED); level of physical exercise (IPAQ); general health (GHQ-28); emotional eating (DEBQ); quality-of-life (IWQOL-Lite); weight self-stigma (WSSQ); experiential avoidance (AAQ-II); self-compassion level (SCS) and mindfulness abilities (FFMQ).
Investigators
Edurne Maiz Aldalur
PhD, Lecturer of School Psychology
University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Adults with overweight or obesity (estimated by BMI ≥ 25 and classified by the International Obesity Task Force, IOTF);
- •Have asked for enrollment in nutritional treatment for weight loss in primary care units from Donostia-San Sebastian;
- •Willingness to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Diagnosed with eating disorders; such as, Binge Eating Disorder, Anorexia or Bulimia;
- •Diagnosed with any psychiatric disorder or intellectual disability that doesn't allow to carry out the intervention;
- •Not to know sufficiently the language the intervention is carried out.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Changes in the quality of life estimated by the Impact of Weight in the Quality of Life-Lite Questionnaire (IWQOL-Lite)
Time Frame: Pretreatment-Posttreatment (5 months)-7 months follow-up
Changes in the quality of life will be estimated by the Impact of Weight in the Quality of Life-Lite Questionnaire (IWQOL-Lite) which is a questionnaire to assess quality of life in obesity. It comprises five subscales that measure weight-related concerns across five domains: Physical Function, Self-Esteem, Sexual Life, Public Distress and Work. The minimum score of the total punctuation is 31 and the maximum punctuation is 155; the minimum score of the Physical Function scale is 11 and the maximum score is 55; the minimum score of the Self-Esteem scale is 7 and the maximum score is 35; the minimum score of the Sexual Life scale is 4 and the maximum score is 20; the minimum score of the Public Distress scale is 5 and the maximum score is 25 and the minimum score of the Work scale is 4 and the maximum is 20. Higher values represent a higher impact of weight in the quality of life of the individual, in the total score and in each of the domains assessed.
Changes in weight self-stigma estimated by the Weight Self-Stigma Questionnaire (WSSQ)
Time Frame: Pretreatment-Posttreatment (5 months)-7 months follow-up
Changes in weight self-stigma will be estimated by the Weight Self-Stigma Questionnaire (WSSQ) which is a questionnaire to assess weight-related self-stigma that comprises two subscales apart from the total punctuation: self-devaluation and fear of enacted stigma. The minimum score of the total punctuation is 0 and the maximum is 72; the minimum score of the Self-Devaluation subscale is 0 and the maximum is 36; the minimum score of the Fear of Enacted-Stigma subscale is 0 and the maximum is 36. Higher values represent a higher weight-related self-stigma, in the total score and in each of the subscales.
Changes in Body Mass Index (BMI) measured by Bio-electrical Impedance Analysis (TANITA)
Time Frame: Pretreatment-Posttreatment (5 months)-7 months follow-up
Changes in Body Mass Index (BMI - kg/m2) will be measured by Bio-electrical Impedance Analysis (TANITA).
Changes in the level of physical exercise estimated by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)
Time Frame: Pretreatment-Posttreatment (5 months)-7 months follow-up
Changes in the level of physical exercise will be estimated by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) which is a questionnaire to assess the level of physical activity. This questionnaire obtains the subject's Metabolic Equivalent of Task (MET) of the last week adding up the MET values of the different types of physical activities the subject has done in the last week. Higher values represent a higher level of physical activity.
Changes in eating habits estimated by 24h recall and PREDIMED questionnaire
Time Frame: Pretreatment-Posttreatment (5 months)-7 months follow-up
Changes in eating habits will be estimated by 24h recall and PREDIMED questionnaire which is a questionnaire to assess the adherence to the Mediterranean diet, 0 being the minimum total score and 14 the maximum total score. Higher values represent a higher adherence to the Mediterranean diet.
Changes in emotional eating estimated by the Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire (DEBQ)
Time Frame: Pretreatment-Posttreatment (5 months)-7 months follow-up
Changes in emotional eating will be estimated by the Dutch Eating Behaviour Questionnaire (DEBQ) which is a questionnaire that comprises three scales that measure emotional, external and restrained eating; being 0 the minimum score and 52 the maximum score of the emotional eating scale, 0 the minimum score and 40 the maximum score of the external eating scale and 0 the minimum score and 40 the maximum score of the restrained eating scale. Higher values represent a higher emotional, external or restrained eating.
Secondary Outcomes
- Changes in insulin sensitivity measured by homeostasis model assessment (HOMA)(Pretreatment-Posttreatment (5 months)-7 months follow-up)
- Changes in serum lipid profile(Pretreatment-Posttreatment (5 months)-7 months follow-up)
- Changes in general health estimated by the General Health Questionnaire-28 (GHQ-28)(Pretreatment-Posttreatment (5 months)-7 months follow-up)
- Changes in eating attitudes estimated by the Eating Attitudes Test-12 (EAT-12)(Pretreatment-Posttreatment (5 months)-7 months follow-up)
- Changes in muscle mass percentage measured by Bio-electrical Impedance Analysis (TANITA)(Pretreatment-Posttreatment (5 months)-7 months follow-up)
- Changes in blood pressure measured by a sphygmomanometer(Pretreatment-Posttreatment (5 months)-7 months follow-up)
- Changes in body image's self-perception estimated by the Figure Rating Scale (FRS)(Pretreatment-Posttreatment (5 months)-7 months follow-up)
- Changes in fat percentage measured by Bio-electrical Impedance Analysis (TANITA)(Pretreatment-Posttreatment (5 months)-7 months follow-up)
- Changes in glucose profile measured by a spectrophotometry(Pretreatment-Posttreatment (5 months)-7 months follow-up)
- Changes in waist circumference measured by an inelastic tape (Holtain)(Pretreatment-Posttreatment (5 months)-7 months follow-up)