Improving Complete Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR) of Colorectal Neoplasia: A Randomized Prospective Comparison of Snares and Injectate in the Resection of Large Sessile Colonic Polyps
试验速览
- 阶段
- 4 期
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- Mayo Clinic
- 入组人数
- 66
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Efficacy of Two Devices used in EMR
研究概览
简要总结
The investigators seek to compare two techniques of removing pre-cancerous lesions from the colon. The investigators also will compare two solutions used during the procedure to determine if either solution allows for an improved removal of the tumors.
详细描述
The primary aim of the study is to compare the efficacy, efficiency and safety of two types of snares used in Endoscopic Mucosal Resection (EMR), a combined needle and snare unit (ISnare, US Endoscopy) versus an oval braided snare with spiral wire (Snaremaster, Olympus). The secondary aim is to explore whether EMR efficacy and efficiency is depended upon the injection solution used, saline versus Gonak (a solution containing HPMC, saline, and epinephrine) for EMR.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Factorial
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Sessile colorectal polyp
- •laterally spreading lesions as defined by Paris Classification type II and > 1 cm or greater
排除标准
- •Those with ulcerated depressed lesions (Paris type III) or biopsy proven invasive carcinoma
- •Inflammatory bowel disease patients
- •Coagulopathy ( INR> 1.5) that cannot be corrected
结局指标
主要结局
Efficacy of Two Devices used in EMR
时间窗: 1 year
To explore the efficacy of two devices used in EMR (iSnare® system versus Snaremaster) as measured by the "Sydney Resection Quotient" (SRQ). SRQ is defined as "lesion size in mm divided by the number of pieces to resect" .
次要结局
- Compare the Use of Two Injectates(1 year)
