NOLA (NeuWave Observational Liver Ablation) Registry
- Conditions
- Liver CancerNeoplasms, LiverCancer of the Liver
- Interventions
- Device: Microwave Ablation
- Registration Number
- NCT04107766
- Lead Sponsor
- Ethicon, Inc.
- Brief Summary
This is a multicenter, observational registry that follows patients for a total of 5 years from the date of the first liver ablation procedure with the NEUWAVE Microwave Ablation System.
- Detailed Description
This is a multicenter, observational registry that follows patients for a total of 5 years from the date of the first liver ablation procedure with the NEUWAVE Microwave Ablation System. The data gathered from participating sites will be available to be analyzed to develop ablation parameter guidance for ablation approaches under varying patient liver tissue conditions and liver lesions.
This is an "umbrella registry," which was included as an optional component in other NEUWAVE studies; hence, data from consenting patients who are or will be enrolled in other NEUWAVE soft tissue liver lesion ablation studies will be included in this registry. All other patients will be enrolled and followed prospectively, enrolled retrospectively with prospective, longitudinal follow up, or enrolled retrospectively with all retrospective follow up.
Enrollment for this study will include up to 1,500 patients throughout the world who underwent or are scheduled to undergo microwave ablation of one or more soft tissue liver lesions using the NEUWAVE Microwave Ablation System or the NEUWAVE Microwave Ablation System with Ablation Confirmation.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 1500
- Patients who underwent or are scheduled to undergo a microwave ablation of one or more liver lesions with the NEUWAVE Microwave Ablation System per the device's Instructions for Use (IFU).
- Patients with signed informed consent (or waiver approved by IRB/EC) who are willing to comply with the assessment schedule, and willing to have data included in the database.
- Patients greater than or equal to 22 years old at the time of informed consent (or waiver approved by IRB/EC).
- Patients with a life expectancy of less than 1 year, in the opinion of the treating physician.
- Use of microwave ablation purely as a transection tool, rather than focused liver lesion ablation.
- Patient is currently participating, or planning to participate, in another NeuWave/Ethicon-funded clinical trial or registry studying microwave ablation in the liver. Note: roll-over patients from previous NeuWave trials are permitted.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Population Microwave Ablation Patients with at least one soft-tissue liver lesion ablated with the NEUWAVE Microwave Ablation System or NEUWAVE Microwave Ablation System with Ablation Confirmation.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Target lesion recurrence (local recurrence) rate 5 years post-ablation Target lesion recurrence (local recurrence) rate is evaluated at every visit after ablation of the target lesion(s), and overall evaluation at the 5-year follow-up, as assessed by CT, MRI, PET, US, and/or X-ray.
Technical success Day of ablation (Day 0) Technical success, defined as ablation of the target lesion(s) according to the protocol and covered completely, with an adequate margin, as defined by the performing physician (i.e. the ablation zone completely overlaps or encompasses the target lesion(s) plus an ablative margin), as assessed by CT, MRI, PET, US, and/or X-ray, immediately following the procedure.
Technical efficacy 7 days to 3 months post-ablation Technique efficacy, ablation of the target lesion(s) according to the protocol and covered completely, with an adequate margin, as defined by the performing physician (i.e., the ablation zone completely overlaps or encompasses the target lesion(s) plus an ablative margin), as assessed by CT, MRI, PET, US, and/or X-ray, at Visit 3 (between 7 days and less than 3 months post-ablation).
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Secondary efficacy rate 5 years post-ablation Secondary efficacy rate, defined as the percentage of soft tissue lesions that have undergone successful repeat ablations (target or non-target) following identification of local soft tissue lesion progression, as assessed by CT, MRI, PET, US, and/or X-ray. A successful repeat ablation will be defined as ablation of the lesion according to the protocol and covered completely, with an adequate margin, as defined by the performing physician (i.e. the ablation zone completely overlaps or encompasses the lesion plus an ablative margin), as assessed by CT, MRI, PET, US, and/or X-ray, immediately following the procedure.
Regional recurrence rate at a separate location in the liver (outside the initial treatment site(s)) 5 years post-ablation Regional recurrence rate at a separate location in the liver (outside the initial treatment site(s)), evaluated at every visit after ablation of the target lesion(s), and overall evaluation at the 5-year follow-up, as assessed by CT, MRI, PET, US, and/or X-ray.
Economic impact of ablation as evaluated by complete procedure duration Day of ablation (Day 0) through hospital discharge, estimated up to 1 week Incidence of reportable Adverse Events/Serious Adverse Events (AEs/SAEs) 5 years post-ablation Incidence of adverse events (AEs) (SAEs) that are deemed at least unlikely related to the procedure or device and all serious adverse events (SAEs) from day of ablation through the end of the study.
Recurrence-free survival 5 years post-ablation Recurrence-free survival, evaluated at every visit after ablation of the target lesion(s), and overall evaluation at the 5-year follow-up, as assessed by CT, MRI, PET, US, and/or X-ray.
Overall survival 5 years post-ablation Overall survival, evaluated at every visit after ablation of the target lesion(s), and overall evaluation at the 5-year follow-up.
Economic impact of ablation as evaluated by complete ablation duration Day of ablation (Day 0) through hospital discharge, estimated up to 1 week Economic impact of ablation as evaluated by number of ablations Day of ablation (Day 0) through hospital discharge, estimated up to 1 week Economic impact of ablation as evaluated by length of hospital stay Day of ablation (Day 0) through hospital discharge, estimated up to 1 week Economic impact of ablation as evaluated by number of probes used Day of ablation (Day 0) through hospital discharge, estimated up to 1 week Economic impact of ablation as evaluated by types of probes used Day of ablation (Day 0) through hospital discharge, estimated up to 1 week Quality of Life Questionnaires (QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HCC18) 9-12 months post-ablation European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and liver-specific QLQ-HCC18 are questionnaires that will be completed at the Ablation Visit (pre-ablation), and each study visit afterwards, up to 9-12 months post-ablation.
Note: These two questionnaires were chosen as tools to assess overall health status/quality of life in the patient population with soft-tissue liver lesions.Numeric Pain Rating Scale 7 days to 3 months post-ablation The Numeric Pain Rating Scale is a questionnaire where the patient reports their pain utilizing a 0-10 scale (where 0 is 'no pain' and 10 is 'maximum pain'). Patients will complete this questionnaire at the Ablation Visit (pre- and post-ablation), and at the first study visit after the ablation (7 days to 3 months post-ablation).
Trial Locations
- Locations (30)
Loma Linda University Medical Center
🇺🇸Loma Linda, California, United States
Cedars Sinai Medical Center
🇺🇸Los Angeles, California, United States
David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA
🇺🇸Los Angeles, California, United States
Sutter Institute for Medical Research
🇺🇸Sacramento, California, United States
Olive View UCLA
🇺🇸Sylmar, California, United States
Mayo Clinic
🇺🇸Jacksonville, Florida, United States
University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine
🇺🇸Miami, Florida, United States
Sarasota Memorial Hospital
🇺🇸Sarasota, Florida, United States
ICAHN School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
🇺🇸New York, New York, United States
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
🇺🇸New York, New York, United States
Thomas Jefferson University
🇺🇸Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
MD Anderson Cancer Center
🇺🇸Houston, Texas, United States
University of Virginia
🇺🇸Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
University of Washington Medical Center
🇺🇸Seattle, Washington, United States
University of Wisconsin At Madison
🇺🇸Madison, Wisconsin, United States
The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
🇨🇳Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
🇨🇳Shanghai, China
Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou
🇫🇷Paris, France
Tenon Hospital
🇫🇷Paris, France
University Hospital Regensburg
🇩🇪Regensburg, Germany
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital (SNUBH)
🇰🇷Seongnam-si, Korea, Republic of
Netherlands Cancer Institute (NKI)
🇳🇱Amsterdam, Netherlands
VUMC Amsterdam
🇳🇱Amsterdam, Netherlands
University Medical Center Goningen
🇳🇱Groningen, Netherlands
Radboud UMC
🇳🇱Nijmegen, Netherlands
Singapore General Hospital
🇸🇬Singapore, Singapore
Tan Tock Seng Hospital
🇸🇬Singapore, Singapore
St. James's University Hospital
🇬🇧Leeds, United Kingdom
The Royal Marsden Hospital
🇬🇧London, United Kingdom
Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital
🇬🇧Norwich, United Kingdom