ong-term follow up of treatment for carpometacarpal thumb joint osteoarthritis: trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and/or tendon interposition versus pyrocarbon disc interpositio

Completed

• Conditions: CMC 1 AO; thumb base osteoarthritis; 10005944

• Registration Number: NL-OMON46102
• Lead Sponsor: Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis

Brief Summary

Not available

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Study Completion: 2020-11-23
• Last Update Posted: 15 April 2024

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Sex: Not specified
• Target Recruitment: 28

Inclusion Criteria

Painful CMC 1 osteoarthritis at initial presentation
Type II and III according to Eaton's classification on x-ray at initial presentation
Minimum of 3 months nonsurgical treatment before treatment with operation
Treated with trapeziectomy with ligament reconstruction and/or tendon interposition

Exclusion Criteria

1. STT osteoarthritis (type IV on Eaton*s classification) at initial presentation
2. Hyperlaxity (syndromes)
3. Systemic degenerative poly or panarthritis (RA, gout, psoriasis)
4. Less than five years after operation

Study & Design

• Study Type: Observational invasive
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
<p>We hypothesize that, patients who have undergone trapeziectomy combined with<br /><br>ligament reconstruction and/or tendon interposition compared to pyrocarbon disc<br /><br>interpostion:<br /><br>1. Have comparable functional recovery<br /><br>2. Have comparable function of the thumb with return to previous work after<br /><br>surgery<br /><br>3. Have comparable reduction in pain after surgery<br /><br>4. Show comparable satisfaction after treatment<br /><br>5. Have comparable reoperations due to postoperative persisting pain </p><br>

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
<p>na</p><br>