MedPath

A Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of IGIV-C in Patients With Myasthenia Gravis Exacerbations

Phase 3
Completed
Conditions
Myasthenia Gravis Exacerbations
Interventions
Biological: IGIV-C
Registration Number
NCT02413580
Lead Sponsor
Grifols Therapeutics LLC
Brief Summary

This was a multicenter, prospective, open-label, non-controlled study to assess the efficacy and safety of an IV dose of 2 g/kg of IGIV-C in subjects with MG exacerbations.

Detailed Description

The study consisted of a single dose course of IGIV-C treatment followed by 28-days of post-infusion assessments. The total duration of study participation for each subject was up to 28 ± 2 days. Approximately 50 subjects, ages 18 or greater, were planned to be enrolled in the study and receive a single, total dose of 2 g/kg of IGIV-C over 2 consecutive days (dose of 1 g/kg per day) across multiple centers in Argentina, Canada, Europe, and South Africa.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
49
Inclusion Criteria
  • Was male or female aged ≥18 years.
  • Subjects must be willing and able to provide written informed consent (if applicable, a legally authorized representative may provide informed consent on behalf of the subject).
  • Subjects who met the clinical criteria for diagnosis of MG with an exacerbation defined as worsening of MG symptoms as defined by an Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) classification IVb or V.
  • Subjects on long-term (8 weeks) corticosteroid treatment for MG.
  • Female subjects of child-bearing potential must have a negative test for pregnancy (human chorionic gonadotropin [HCG]-based assay).
  • Subjects must be willing to comply with all aspects of the clinical trial protocol, including blood sampling and long-term storage of extra samples, for the entire duration of the study.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Subjects who had received immune globulin treatment given by IV, subcutaneous or intramuscular route within the last 30 days.
  • Subjects with documentation of a lack of clinical response to intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) therapy for MG.
  • Subjects documented positive for antibodies directed against Muscle specific kinase (MuSK).
  • Subjects with corticosteroid (CS) treatment initiated within the last 8 weeks or modified within the last 2 weeks.
  • Subjects with plasma exchange (PLEX) within the last 30 days.
  • Subjects with MG exacerbation attributable to change in medication or infection or evident infection as defined by, but not limited to, the presence of at least one of the following diagnostic features: 1) axillary temperature ≥38°C, 2) positive blood culture of infective microorganism, 3) white blood cell count >12×10^9/L and differential white blood cell count of >10% band neutrophils (>1.2×10^9/L), and 4) pulmonary infiltrate with consolidation on chest X-ray. Alternatively, other signs and symptoms may be considered for the diagnosis of evident infection according to the Investigator's judgement.
  • Subjects with inadequate venous access.
  • Subjects with a history of anaphylactic reactions or severe reactions to any blood-derived product.
  • Subjects with a history of intolerance to any component of the investigational products.
  • Subjects with a documented diagnosis of thrombotic complications to polyclonal IVIG therapy in the past.
  • Subjects with a history of recent (within the last year) myocardial infarction, stroke or uncontrolled hypertension.
  • Subjects who suffered from uncontrolled congestive heart failure, embolism or documented electrocardiogram (ECG) changes indicative of myocardial ischemia or atrial fibrillation.
  • Subjects with current known hyperviscosity or hypercoagulable state.
  • Subjects currently receiving anti-coagulation therapy.
  • Subjects with a history of chronic alcoholism or illicit drug abuse (addiction) in the 12 months preceding the Baseline Visit.
  • Subjects currently receiving, or having received within 3 months prior to the Baseline Visit, any investigational medicinal product or device.
  • Subjects with a known Immunoglobulin A (IgA) deficiency and anti-IgA serum antibodies.
  • Subjects with renal impairment (i.e., serum creatinine exceeds more than 1.5 times the upper limit of normal [ULN] for the expected normal range for the testing laboratory).
  • Subjects with aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels exceeding more than 2.5 times the ULN for the expected normal range for the testing laboratory.
  • Subjects with haemoglobin levels <9 g/dL.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
IGIV-C TreatmentIGIV-CIn this arm, subjects with myasthenia gravis exacerbations were treated with an IV dose of 2 g/kg of IGIV-C, which was administered over 2 consecutive days at a dose of 1 g/kg per day.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Scale ScoreFrom Baseline (Day 0) to Day 14

Mean Change in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) Scale Score from Baseline (Day 0) to Day 14. The minimum and maximum scores of the QMG Scale are 0 and 39, respectively, and a higher score means a worse outcome.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percentage of Subjects With Clinical Improvement Assessed by QMGBaseline (Day 0) to Day 14

The percentage of subjects with clinical improvement at Day 14 as assessed by the Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) scale in the Evaluable population is presented, in which clinical improvement is defined as at least 3-point decrease in QMG score from Baseline (Day 0) to Day 14. The minimum and maximum scores of the QMG scale are 0 and 39, respectively, and a higher score means a worse outcome.

Percentage of Subjects With Clinical Improvement Assessed by MG-Activities of Daily Living (MG-ADL) ScaleBaseline (Day 0) to Day 14

The percentage of subjects with clinical improvement at Day 14 as assessed by the MG-ADL Scale in the Evaluable population is presented, in which clinical improvement is defined as at least 2-point decrease in the MG-ADL score. The minimum and maximum scores of the MG-DAL scale are 0 and 24, respectively, and a higher score means a worse outcome.

Percentage of Subjects With Clinical Improvement Assessed by the MG CompositeBaseline (Day 0) to Day 14

The percentage of subjects with clinical improvement at Day 14 as assessed by the MG Composite scale in the Evaluable population is presented in which clinical improvement is defined as at least 3-point decrease in the MG Composite score. The minimum and maximum scores of the MG Composite scale are 0 and 50, respectively, with a higher score meaning a worse outcome.

Trial Locations

Locations (31)

Hospital Italiano

🇦🇷

Buenos Aires, Argentina

Hospital General de Agudos Dr. J. M.

🇦🇷

Buenos Aires, Argentina

Jahn Ferenc Del-Pesti Korhaz

🇭🇺

Budapest, Hungary

East Tallinn Central Hospital

🇪🇪

Tallinn, Estonia

University of Szeged, Faculty of Medicine

🇭🇺

Szeged, Hungary

Uniwersyteckie Centrum Kliniczne

🇵🇱

Gdansk, Poland

UZ Leuven

🇧🇪

Leuven, Belgium

AZ St Lucas Gent

🇧🇪

Ghent, East Flanders, Belgium

University of Alberta Hospital

🇨🇦

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

London Health Sciences Centre

🇨🇦

London, Ontario, Canada

Fakultni nemocnice Brno, Neurologicka klinika

🇨🇿

Brno, Czechia

University Health Network (UHN) - Toronto General Hospital

🇨🇦

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Fakultni nemocnice Ostrava, Neurologická klinika

🇨🇿

Ostrava, Czechia

Vseobecna fakultni nemocnice v Praze

🇨🇿

Prague, Czechia

Hopital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer

🇫🇷

Bron, Lyon, France

Hôpital Albert Michallon

🇫🇷

Grenoble, France

Hopital Roger Salengro

🇫🇷

Lille, France

CHU de Toulouse - Hôpital Purpan

🇫🇷

Toulouse, France

Hôpital de la Timone

🇫🇷

Marseille, France

Hôpital Hautepierre Strasbourg

🇫🇷

Strasbourg, France

Pest Megyei Flor Ferenc Korhaz

🇭🇺

Kistarcsa, Hungary

Szabolcs-Szatmár-Bereg Megyei Kórházak és Egyetemi Oktatókórház

🇭🇺

Nyíregyháza, Hungary

Riga East Clinical University Hospital

🇱🇻

Riga, Latvia

Zala Megyei Korhaz

🇭🇺

Zalaegerszeg, Hungary

Institutul Clinic Fundeni

🇷🇴

Bucuresti, Romania

State Budgetary Institution of Healthcare of Nizhniy Novgorod region. Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Clinical Hospital named after N.A.Semashko

🇷🇺

Nizhniy Novgorod, Russian Federation

Spitalul Clinic Judetean de Urgenta Targu-Mures

🇷🇴

Targu Mures, Romania

Saint-Petersburg State Budgetary Institution of Healthcare. City Multi-field Hospital # 2

🇷🇺

Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation

Hospital Cordoba

🇦🇷

Cordoba, Argentina

State Budgetary Institution of Healthcare "Samara Regional Clinical Hospital. V.D.Seredavin

🇷🇺

Samara, Russian Federation

Groote Schuur Hospital,

🇿🇦

Cape Town, South Africa

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath