Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01575028
NCT01575028
Terminated
Phase 2

A Prospective, Double Blinded, Randomized Comparison of Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Versus Local Anesthetic Infiltration for Laparoscopic Appendectomy in the Pediatric Population

Nationwide Children's Hospital1 site in 1 country3 target enrollmentOctober 2012

Overview

Phase
Phase 2
Intervention
Bupivacaine
Conditions
Appendicitis
Sponsor
Nationwide Children's Hospital
Enrollment
3
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Post-operative Pain Relief
Status
Terminated
Last Updated
10 years ago

Overview

Brief Summary

This study is a prospective, double-blinded, randomized comparison of 2 patient cohorts. One group of patients will receive a transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block. The second group will receive local anesthetic infiltration injected at the surgical site by the surgeon at the end of surgery for a laparoscopic appendectomy. The purpose of this study is to prospectively compare post-operative pain relief in pediatric patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy who have received either a transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block or local anesthetic infiltration by the surgeon for analgesia to compare the most appropriate delivery of effective analgesia. In an effort to improve postoperative analgesia while limiting opioid-related adverse effects, there continues to be an increased use of multimodal techniques in infants and children.

Detailed Description

The literature has clearly demonstrated that the effective treatment of postoperative pain in infants and children is challenging. Despite the recognition of the importance of postoperative analgesia and the potential adverse effects of postoperative pain, significant pain occurs during the postoperative period in both the inpatient and outpatients settings. Specifically, appendectomy is one of the most common pediatric surgical procedures and is associated with significant postoperative pain. Additionally, although the use of opioid analgesics is generally safe, adverse effects do occur thereby mandating the use of alternative analgesic techniques when feasible. In an effort to improve postoperative analgesia while limiting opioid-related adverse effects, there continues to be an increased use of multimodal techniques in infants and children. These can include TAP block as well as wound infiltration with local anesthetic. The efficacy of TAP blocks in the setting of laparoscopic appendectomy has been demonstrated in both adult and pediatric populations, however its efficacy in comparison to local anesthetic infiltration is unclear. The TAP block was first described by McDonnell et al. in 2004 for pain control of procedures involving the anterior abdominal wall. The skin, muscles, and parietal peritoneum in this region are innervated by the T7 through L1 nerve roots. The authors described deposition of local anesthetic in the plane between the internal oblique and the transversus abdominis muscle where the terminal branches of the T7 through L1 nerves lie. Since then, the TAP block has been shown to effectively provide analgesia for a variety of abdominal procedures. In 2007 an ultrasound guided approach was described by Hebbard et al. with a subsequent study concluding that an ultrasound guided TAP block provided superior analgesia than a blind technique. The frequency of surgical appendectomy in both the inpatient surgical as well as the ambulatory setting justifies this comparison of effective analgesia. This study can certainly change the daily practice of the pediatric anesthesiologist in providing optimal care in patient and family satisfaction, as well as recovery.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
October 2012
End Date
July 2014
Last Updated
10 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Parallel
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Tarun Bhalla, MD

Assistant Clinical Professor

Nationwide Children's Hospital

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • ASA physical status I or II
  • Patients \> 4 years of age
  • Weight less than or equal to 60 kg
  • Presenting for laparoscopic appendectomy

Exclusion Criteria

  • ASA physical status \> II
  • Patients \< 4 years of age
  • Weight greater than 60 kg
  • Patients presenting for ruptured appendectomy surgical procedures
  • Co-morbid diseases (cardiac, pulmonary (not including asthma), neurological disease)
  • Patients having concomitant procedures (circumcision, orchiopexy, etc.)

Arms & Interventions

Local anesthetic infiltration injection

Patients will receive local anesthetic infiltration injected at the surgical site by the surgeon at the end of surgery.

Intervention: Bupivacaine

Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block

Patients will receive a transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block.

Intervention: Ropivacaine

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Post-operative Pain Relief

Time Frame: 12 hours post-operatively

Prospectively compare post-operative pain relief in pediatric patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy who have received either a transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block or local anesthetic infiltration by the surgeon for analgesia.

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Completed
Phase 1
Study, Double Blind, Randomized, Comparing Two Groups to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells From Adipose Tissue (CMMAd) in the Treatment of the Faecal IncontinenceFaecal Incontinence
NCT02292628Andalusian Initiative for Advanced Therapies - Fundación Pública Andaluza Progreso y Salud16
Completed
Phase 4
A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of 5 % against 1.25 % povidone-iodine solution in preoperative antisepsis for strabismus surgery in young children.
NL-OMON30444Erasmus MC, Universitair Medisch Centrum Rotterdam100
Active, not recruiting
Not Applicable
A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of 5 % against 1 % povidone-iodine solution in preoperative antisepsis for strabismus surgery in young children.Endophthalmitis (E) after strabismus surgery (S) leading to blindness is caused by eyelid and conjunctival bacteria. Povidone-iodine(PI) solutions between 1% and 5% reduce the number of bacteria on the conjunctiva and the incidence of E after S. In cataract surgery 5% PI was shown to be more effective than 1% PI in decreasing the conjunctival bacterial flora. As E after S especially afflicts younger children this study is to compare ocular antisepsis achieved by 5% PI vs 1.25% PI in children.MedDRA version: 8.1Level: PTClassification code 10049924Term: Infection prophylaxis
EUCTR2006-004811-22-NLErasmus Medical Center Rotterdam250
Recruiting
Phase 3
Safety and Efficacy of APC-0101 in Preterm Infants With Respiratory Distress Syndrome
NCT06776783Aerogen Pharma Limited520
Completed
Phase 2
Liposome Bupivacaine Interscalene Total ShoulderAcute Pain
NCT03587636University of Minnesota77