Comparison of Two Pericardial Bioprostheses in AVR
- Conditions
- Aortic Valve Disease
- Interventions
- Device: AVR with AVALUSDevice: AVR with CEPME
- Registration Number
- NCT03796442
- Lead Sponsor
- Seoul National University Hospital
- Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to compare early and 1-year hemodynamic performance and clinical outcomes after aortic valve replacement using two pericardial bioprosthesis, Avalus and Carpentier Edwards Perimount Magna Ease.
- Detailed Description
This trial was designed as a multicenter randomized, controlled trial to recruit 386 patients who undergo aortic valve replacement with pericardial bioprosthesis. Patients were randomized by use of a randomization table. Bioprosthesis was chosen between Avalus or Carpentier Edwards Perimount Magna Ease according to the randomization result. The primary end point is postoperative 1-year transvalvular mean pressure gradient. The secondary end points are postoperative 1-year effective orifice area, operative mortality, operative morbidities, 1-year overall survival, 1-year freedom from cardiac death and 1-year freedom from valve-related events.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 140
- patients who are going to undergo aortic valve replacement with bioprosthesis
- heart failure with severe LV dysfunction (LV EF <30%)
- active infective endocarditis
- with other critical cardiovascular disease (e.g. acute aortic dissection)
- with other critical comorbities by which the expected life span is less than 1 year
- inadequate participant by the researcher's discretion
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description AVALUS group AVR with AVALUS patients who will undergo aortic valve replacement with Avalus bioprosthesis CEPME group AVR with CEPME patients who will undergo aortic valve replacement with Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna Ease bioprosthesis
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Transvalvular Mean Pressure Gradient (mPG) at postoperative 1 year transvalvular mean pressure gradient measured by trans-thoracic echocardiography
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Number of Participants With Op Morbidities at postoperative 1 year low cardiac output syndrome, bleeding reoperation, perioperative myocardial infarction, stroke, acute kidney injury, respiratory complication, new onset atrial fibrillation, mediastinitis, surgical wound infection
Effective Orifice Area (EOA) at postoperative 1 year effective orifice area measured by trans-thoracic echocardiography
Number of Participants With Op Mortality at postoperative 30 days or at the time of discharge any death within 30 days after surgery or during the same hospital admission
Number of Participants With All-cause Mortality at postoperative 1 year patients who died from any cause
Number of Participants With Cardiac Death at postoperative 1 year Any death related to cardiac events, including sudden death during follow-up
Number of Participants With Aortic Valve-related Events at postoperative 1 year valve-related mortality, thromboembolism, bleeding, endocarditis, reoperation
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
Seoul National University Hospital
🇰🇷Seoul, Korea, Republic of
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
🇰🇷Seongnam, Korea, Republic of