Multicentric, Open Label With Retrospective Inclusion and Follow-up of Acetabular Prothetic Implant "Polymax"
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis
- Interventions
- Other: Early complications dataOther: Late stage complications dataOther: Patient SatisfactionOther: EfficacityOther: Radiographic evaluation
- Registration Number
- NCT02826187
- Lead Sponsor
- University Hospital, Toulouse
- Brief Summary
Total replacement of hip joint is one of the most important medical innovations of the twentieth century. More than 100,000 hip replacements are being laid each year in France.
Improved fixation, reduced wear rates and reduced implant dislocation rates remain subjects of continuous improvement.
Hip implants cemented and cementless are part of therapeutic arsenal of orthopedic surgeons for joint replacement of the defective hip.
The anchor and friction torque are both essential to the survival of hip implants. Therefore acetabular implants without cement with ceramic insert or polyethylene in a metalback or full polyethylene coated with titanium grains without metalback are proposed, but they have their own complications (Squeaking, fractures, recovery difficulties, difficult radiographic analysis, high cost for ceramics, primary stability defects, instability of the instrument set, Titanium residues in absence of metalback. An alternative to these implants may be an acetabular component without cement with polyethylene insert with an end metalback to increase both polyethylene thickness and size of the head in order to expect a low complication rate with important longevity for a lower cost.
This study was conducted to ensure the safety and effectiveness of the acetabular implant "POLYMAX"
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 181
- Patient suffering from hip disease: primary or secondary hip osteoarthritis or osteonecrosis.
- Patient having been implanted with a POLYMAX implant;
- Patient having agreed to participate in a follow-up 5 years;
- Patient who have accepted the use of their data in the context of this study.
- Patient having pre-operative and post-operative data
- Pre or post-operative Partial data
- Patients not available for follow up at 2 and 5 years ..
- Metabolic disease or autoimmune witch may interfere with bone growth not allowing the indication of a prosthesis without cement,
- Mental disorder or disease of proven behavior.
- Severe osteoporosis,
- Direct or indirect bone irradiation
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Patients with acetabular implant Late stage complications data Data to be collected are : * Early complications data related to implant or procedure of implantation * Late stage complications data * Efficacity of treatment with HIP score * Patient satisfaction * Radiographic evaluation during standard follow-up Patients with acetabular implant Efficacity Data to be collected are : * Early complications data related to implant or procedure of implantation * Late stage complications data * Efficacity of treatment with HIP score * Patient satisfaction * Radiographic evaluation during standard follow-up Patients with acetabular implant Early complications data Data to be collected are : * Early complications data related to implant or procedure of implantation * Late stage complications data * Efficacity of treatment with HIP score * Patient satisfaction * Radiographic evaluation during standard follow-up Patients with acetabular implant Patient Satisfaction Data to be collected are : * Early complications data related to implant or procedure of implantation * Late stage complications data * Efficacity of treatment with HIP score * Patient satisfaction * Radiographic evaluation during standard follow-up Patients with acetabular implant Radiographic evaluation Data to be collected are : * Early complications data related to implant or procedure of implantation * Late stage complications data * Efficacity of treatment with HIP score * Patient satisfaction * Radiographic evaluation during standard follow-up
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Innocuity of POLYMAX acetabular implant as assessed by data collected on late-stage complications 60 months Innocuity of POLYMAX acetabular implant as assessed by data collected on early complications 60 months
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Evaluation of implant good holding as assessed by apparition of radiolucent lines in radiography 60 months Efficacity of POLYMAX acetabular implant as assessed by Harris clinical score 60 months Patient satisfaction as assessed by Womac reduced score 60 months
Trial Locations
- Locations (2)
Purpan Hospital
🇫🇷Toulouse, France
Saint Grégoire Hospital
🇫🇷Saint Grégoire, France