MedPath

Effect of Video Assisted Versus Traditional method of training breathing exercise on single breath count and chest expansion in patients with respiratory Diseases.

Completed
Conditions
Diseases of the respiratory system,
Registration Number
CTRI/2021/10/037305
Lead Sponsor
Mariya P Jiandani
Brief Summary

Breathing exercise forms an essential part of rehabilitation of patients with primary pulmonary disease. Most patients with pulmonary dysfunctions have altered breathing pattern with use of accessory muscles. They need correct training of recruitment of respiratory muscles, primarily diaphragm. A correct technique of doing Breathing exercise improves ventilation and pulmonary function. Traditionally breathing training program is given to the patients by face to face method with regular follow-ups or visits after 2 weeks.

With evolution of era and technology, we all are familiar with screen devices like smartphones and all others. The pandemic has brought in online consultations and tele-rehabilitation. Use of tele-rehabilitation requires constant online time, connectivity and manpower. Use of pre-recorded video in training would be flexible and not need connectivity or manpower. It is essential to see the effectiveness of using such technology in treatment purpose when compared with traditional method. As this Diaphragmatic breathing exercise is the preliminary breathing exercise, this study aimed to compare the effect of video assisted versus traditional method of training diaphragmatic breathing exercise on single breath count and chest expansion in patients with Pulmonary Disease.

Effect on Pulmonary function variables such as single breath count (SBC), Chest expansion(upper chest expansion at T5 and Lower chest expansion at T10) were measured and data was compared among video assisted training and traditional breathing training. Patients having diagnosis of primary pulmonary disease, age between 18-60, having screen device which has facility to watch video and those who were referred to physiotherapy for breathing exercise for 1st time were included. Pre-treatment parameters such as single breath count and chest expansion(upper chest & lower chest) were taken. Then among these patients, individuals were selected randomly using blinded envelop method to whom either traditional breathing retraining was taught or video assisted breathing was taught. Patients were advised to practice taught technique at home 3 times a day regularly for 2 weeks period and further during their routine follow up after 2 weeks, re-assessment was done using SBC, chest expansion(upper chest & lower chest). Objective data was collected for both these methods, both traditional and video assisted group generated statistically significant results on SBC and chest expansion (p<0.0001). There was no difference between two methods of training on SBC(p=0.2428), upper chest expansion(0.6995) and lower chest expansion(p=0.1810). in this trial, it is concluded that both methods were found to be equally beneficial in improving pulmonary functions in patients with pulmonary disease after 2 weeks of training.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
Completed
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
40
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patient age between 18-60 of either sex.
  • Medically diagnosed with primary pulmonary disease referred to physiotherapy for breathing exercises.
  • Those visiting for first time to cardio-respiratory rehabilitation centre.
  • Patients having phone which has facility to watch the video.
Exclusion Criteria
    1. Patients with primary cardiac disease.
    1. Patients with known vision abnormality and auditory dysfunction.
    1. Patients in acute exacerbations, febrile, who are haemodynamically unstable, with high respiratory rates >28.
    1. Patients with primary Neurological conditions such as Guillain-Barre syndrome, stroke, Parkinson’s disease etc.
    1. Patients with primary muscular disease such as muscular dystrophy, polymyositis, fibromyalgia etc.
    1. Patients not willing to participate in the study.

Study & Design

Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Single breath count (SBC)Baseline, 2 Weeks
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
chest expansionbaseline, 2 weeks

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

PT school and centre, Seth GSMC and KEM Hospital

🇮🇳

(Suburban), MAHARASHTRA, India

PT school and centre, Seth GSMC and KEM Hospital
🇮🇳(Suburban), MAHARASHTRA, India
Mariya P Jiandani
Principal investigator
02224143435
mpjiandani@gmail.com

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.