跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2024/04/065135
CTRI/2024/04/065135招募中不适用

To compare the effect of Sliders vs Tensioners on Nerve Conduction Studies in Lumbar Radiculopathy Patients

未提供1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 30 人开始时间: 2024年4月12日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
入组人数
30
试验地点
1
主要终点
Electrical Response of Nerve using

研究概览

简要总结

The aim of the study is to compare the effect of Sliders and Tensioners neurodynamic mobilization on the parameters of Nerve Conduction Studies (NCS) in lumbar radiculopathy patients.

Patients will be recruited from Physiotherapy Outpatient Department of Manav Rachna University. A study sample of 30 participants will be selected on the basis of inclusion & exclusion criteria. The subjects will be randomly divided into three groups: Group A- Sliders group, Group B- Tensioners group & Group C- Control Group. A written informed consent will be taken from the participants after explaining them the treatment protocol, associated risks & benefits Outcome measures will be measured at baseline and after termination of 4 weeks and will be compared.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
盲法
Participant Blinded

入排标准

年龄范围
25.00 Year(s) 至 49.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • Diagnosed cases of Lumbar Radiculopathy with Clinical Symptoms
  • NPRS Score between 4/10 to 8/10
  • Chronic Cases more than/ equal to 3 months
  • able to comprehend English language.

排除标准

  • Patients with diabetic neuropathy radiculopathy due to other pathology: tumour, instability
  • chemical dependence/ alcohol abuse
  • any vertebral fracture/ spinal surgery in past 2 years
  • history of systemic disorder.

结局指标

主要结局

Electrical Response of Nerve using

时间窗: base line assessment | re assessment after 4 weeks

- H reflex latency of Tibial Nerve

时间窗: base line assessment | re assessment after 4 weeks

- F wave latency of Tibial Nerve

时间窗: base line assessment | re assessment after 4 weeks

- F wave latency of Common Peroneal Nerve

时间窗: base line assessment | re assessment after 4 weeks

次要结局

  • - NPRS Score(- Modified ODI Score)

研究者

发起方
未提供
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Nitya Chophla

Manav Rachna International Institute Research & Studies

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验