MedPath

Comparison of Three Types of Sutures in Oral Surgery. Study of Bacterial Colonization, Tissue Reaction and Clinical Characteristics: Randomized Clinical Study

Not Applicable
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Wound Healing Complication
Oral Surgery
Third Molar Extraction
Oral Infection
Registration Number
NCT06864559
Lead Sponsor
Universidad de Granada
Brief Summary

Considering the wide variety of surgical sutures currently marketed in the field of Dentistry, it was decided to conduct a study comparing the microbial adhesion and antibacterial activity of three different types of sutures used in Oral Surgery (Silk, non-absorbable polyamide monofilament and non-absorbable expanded polytetrafluoroethylene).

Detailed Description

The general or primary objective is:

• To compare 3 non-absorbable suture materials used in oral surgery: silk, polyamide monofilament and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene.

The specific or secondary objectives are:

* To evaluate how each type of suture influences wound healing and the patient's postoperative period.

* To study bacterial colonization in each type of suture.

* To determine the tissue reaction and clinical characteristics of each suture.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
24
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients with indication for extraction of a third lower molar retained in an unfavorable position that requires a bayonet incision in the surgical procedure.
  • Age: patients aged 18 years or older.
  • ASA I patients (Classification of the American Society of Anesthesiology, 1979): healthy patients who tolerate stress well, without systemic pathology, no anxiety and in whom a therapeutic modification is not necessary.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
  • Smoking patients.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Bacterial colonization7 days.

Microbiological analysis: CFU and qPCR bacterial count.

Level of inflammation7 days.

The degree of soft tissue inflammation was assessed using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath