Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05776498
NCT05776498Active, not recruitingNot Applicable

Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Immediate Implant Placement Using Dual Zone Approach Versus Connective Tissue Graft: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Cairo University1 site in 1 country30 target enrollmentStarted: June 1, 2021Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Active, not recruiting
Enrollment
30
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
pink esthetic score (PES)

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Tooth extraction is followed by ridge alteration and soft tissue collapse and recession. Different strategies were proposed to limit this collapse however, the ability of these techniques to mimic the original soft tissue level and to maintain long term stability is unclear (Slagter et al., 2014). Using customized contoured healing abutments at the time of immediate implant placement is a treatment modality to improve esthetics by maintaining the soft tissue level and contour (Ruales-Carrera et al, 2019, Perez et al, 2020). Using connective tissue grafts has been suggested to enhance and maintain soft tissue stability, however, the effect of the combined procedures for maintenance of the soft tissue morphology compared to customized healing abutments alone remains unclear (Atieh et al, 2019). In patients with non-restorable teeth in the esthetic zone, will the use of bone grafts to the dual zone with customized healing abutment vs the use of connective tissue graft with customized healing abutment in immediately placed implants shows better buccal contour avoiding horizontal collapse?

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Patient-related criteria:
  • •Adults at or above the age of
  • •Non-restorable maxillary anterior or premolar tooth requiring extraction and needed an implant placing therapy.
  • •The failing tooth will have adjacent and opposing natural teeth.
  • •Sufficient mesial-distal and interocclusal space for placement of the implant and definitive restoration.
  • •Able to tolerate surgical periodontal procedures.
  • •Full mouth plaque and bleeding scores less than 20%.
  • •Compliance with the maintenance program.
  • •Provide informed consent.
  • •Accepts the one-year follow-up period.
  • •Teeth related criteria:
  • •Intact thick biotype gingival tissue with at least 2mm band of keratinized tissue.
  • •Intact socket wall before the extraction, buccal bone thickness ≤1mm assessed by CBCT.
  • •Sufficient apical bone to place an immediate implant with minimum primary stability of 30Ncm.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Patients diagnosed with periodontal diseases.
  • •Current or previous smokers.
  • •Pregnant and lactating females.
  • •Patients with medical conditions that would compromise the surgical procedures; uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, taking IV Bis-phosphonates for treatment of osteoporosis.
  • •Patients with active infection related at the site of implant/bone graft placement.
  • •Patients with parafunctional habits

Arms & Interventions

immediate implant placement with particulate bone graft using the dual zone technique.

Experimental

immediate implant placement with particulate bone graft using the dual zone technique.

Intervention: immediate implant placement with particulate bone graft using the dual zone technique. (Procedure)

immediate implant placement with connective tissue grafting

Experimental

immediate implant placement with connective tissue grafting

Intervention: immediate implant placement with connective tissue grafting (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

pink esthetic score (PES)

Time Frame: 3 months after crown placement

To evaluate the pink esthetic score 1-14 score

Secondary Outcomes

  • Mid-facial recession(1 year)
  • Volumetric analysis of buccal contour(6 months)
  • gingival biotype(1 year)
  • Interdental papilla(1 year)
  • Bone formed labial to the implant(1 year)
  • Horizontal labio-palatal bone width(1 year)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Nesma Mohamed Fouad Shemais

Lecturer in the department of Oral Medicine & Periodontology

Cairo University

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials