Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05659433
NCT05659433CompletedNot Applicable

Contrast-enhanced vs. B-mode Ultrasound-guided Percutaneous Biopsy of Retroperitoneal Tumors - a Randomized Controlled Trial

Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy2 sites in 1 country160 target enrollmentStarted: January 1, 2015Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Sponsor
Enrollment
160
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Number of patients with a biopsy sample adequate for pathology interpretation

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Background: Retroperitoneal tumors are typically large and inhomogeneous, with a variable amount of necrosis within the tumor mass which decreases the diagnostic yield of biopsy (false negative or inadequate).

Rationale: Real-time contrast enhancement can highlight the viable tumoral tissue and avoid the necrotic area.

Aims: To compare contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) guidance and conventional (B-mode) ultrasound (US) guidance in terms of diagnostic yield, need for repeat biopsy, and rate of adverse events.

Methods: A consecutive series of patients with previously documented retroperitoneal tumors and indications for percutaneous biopsy were randomly assigned to benefit from the standard of practice B-mode US-guided biopsy or CEUS-guided biopsy.

The diagnostic accuracy, need for repeat biopsy, and adverse events were noted.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • All patients with retroperitoneal tumors with indication for percutaneous biopsy

Exclusion Criteria

  • Tumors inaccessible for ultrasound guided biopsy
  • Standard contraindications for biopsy (altered coagulation tests, poor performance status)
  • Lack of written informed consent

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Number of patients with a biopsy sample adequate for pathology interpretation

Time Frame: 4 weeks

Secondary Outcomes

  • Number of patients with procedural-related adverse events(One week)
  • Number of patients requiring a second biopsy due to prior inadequate sampling(6 weeks)

Investigators

Sponsor
Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy
Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Rareș Crăciun

Principal Investigator

Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials