MedPath

The Effect of the Mandala Method in Reduction of Psychological Distress During Anogenital Examination of Sexually Abused Children Aged 9-12

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Anxiety
Sexual Abuse of Child (If Focus of Attention is on Victim)
Fear and Anxiety
Registration Number
NCT07106606
Lead Sponsor
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa
Brief Summary

The goal of this study is evaluating the effectiveness of a mandala-coloring intervention in reducing psychological distress (fear, state anxiety, and related physiological indicators) during anogenital examinations among sexually abused children aged 9-12.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
68
Inclusion Criteria
  • Coming to anogenital examination for the first time,
  • The child and parents have native Turkish language skills and the ability to read and write.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Sensory loss at a level that prevents communication with the child,
  • Intelligence quotient (IQ) of 55 and below in the records,
  • Has a mental or neurological disability that prevents communication.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Findings on Anxiety LevelBaseline, half an hour before the anogenital examination and immediately after anogenital examination

State Anxiety Inventory for Children used in this study. It was developed by Spielberger to measure state and trait anxiety levels of children aged 9-12 years. Its adaptation into Turkish, validity and reliability study was conducted by Özusta (1993). It consists of two subscales, "state anxiety" and "trait anxiety", each consisting of 20 items.

State anxiety subscale: Measures how the child feels "at that moment". Trait anxiety subscale: Measures how the child feels "in general". Both subscales give scores ranging from 20 to 60. In this study, since the change in state anxiety level before and after the anogenital examination will be evaluated, the "state anxiety" subscale was predominantly reflected in the findings. However, although trait anxiety was not examined in pre- and post-examination comparison, this subscale was also examined in the pre-test and post-test measurements. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of state anxiety subscale was 0.82 and trait anxiety subscale was 0.81

Findings on Fear LevelBaseline, half an hour before the anogenital examination and immediately after anogenital examination

Children's Fear Scale: It is a single-item scale consisting of 5 facial expressions. The first facial expression is scored as neutral (0) and the last facial expression as the highest fear (4). It is used to measure the fear level of children before and after the procedure (blood sampling, examination, etc.) (McMurtry et al., 2011). In this study, it was used to determine the change in fear level before and after anogenital examination. Since it includes a single scoring, the reliability coefficient was not calculated.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Cardiac Pulse FindingBaseline, half an hour before the anogenital examination and immediately after anogenital examination

It is a form in which the pulse (beats/min) counts and the scores obtained from the scales are recorded before and after the examination.

Respiratory Rate FindingBaseline, half an hour before the anogenital examination and immediately after anogenital examination

It is a form in which the respiration (breaths/min) counts and the scores obtained from the scales are recorded before and after the examination.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Istanbul Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital Child Advocacy Center

🇹🇷

Istanbul, Basaksehir, Turkey

Istanbul Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital Child Advocacy Center
🇹🇷Istanbul, Basaksehir, Turkey

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.