跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05973695
NCT05973695已完成不适用

Effects of Clamshell Versus Gluteal Bridge Exercises on Low Back Pain, Gluteal Strength and Disability Due to Prolonged Sitting in Females With Gluteal Amnesia

Riphah International University2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 32 人开始时间: 2023年10月5日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
32
试验地点
2
主要终点
Quality of Life EQ-5D

研究概览

简要总结

Gluteal amnesia is a "condition" where the individual is believed to have lost the ability to contract their gluteal muscles - generally the gluteus maximus, though some report it as the gluteus medius. This can take many different names, such as "dead butt", "sleeping glutes", or glutes that are "turned off".Since the gluteus medius normally helps stabilize the pelvis, gluteal amnesia can lead to lower back pain and hip pain, as well as knee and ankle issues, as the body tries to compensate for the imbalance.

详细描述

A Randomized controlled trial will be conducted at Jinnah Hospital Physiotherapy Clinic & Boston Physiotherapy and wellness Clinic through consecutive sampling technique on 32 patients which will be allocated through simple random sampling through sealed opaque enveloped into group A & group B. Group A will be treated with clamshell exercises at the frequency of 3 sets with 10 repetitions 3 times/ week with baseline treatment. Group B will be treated with gluteal bridge and baseline treatment. Baseline treatment for both groups will be given Hot pack at low back for 10 minutes and Quadriceps and hamstring stretching 3 times with 30 seconds hold. Outcome measures will be conducted through pain, disability and quality of life questionnaire after 6 weeks. Data will be analyzed during SPSS software version 21. After assessing normality of data by Shapiro -Wilk test, it will be decided either parametric or non-parametric test will be used within a group or between two groups.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
20 Years 至 40 Years(Adult)
性别
Female
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • • Female between the ages of 20 to 40 years
  • Prolonged sitting hours >4 hours.
  • Examination- Symptoms provoked by low back movement.
  • Positive Gluteal strength test
  • Positive SLR for hamstring tightness
  • Positive Thomas test for Rectus femoris tightness.

排除标准

  • • Osteoporosis
  • Malignancy
  • Vertebral fractures
  • Pervious or scheduled surgery
  • Pregnancy
  • Psychological conditions

结局指标

主要结局

Quality of Life EQ-5D

时间窗: upto 4 weeks

EQ-5D Health-Related Quality of Life Question checked the quality of life of the patients. Descriptive system for health-related quality of life states in adults, consisting of five dimensions (Mobility, Self-care, Usual activities, Pain \& discomfort, Anxiety \& depression), each with five severity levels described by statements appropriate to that dimension. The scale ranges from 100 ('the best imaginable health state' or 'the best health state you can imagine') to 0 ('the worst imaginable health state' or 'the worst health you can imagine'). This is used to obtain a respondent's stated preference values, not to record their own health state.

Numerical Pain Rating scale (NPRS)

时间窗: upto 4 weeks

The numerical Pain Rating scale (NPRS) assesses the pain in the gluteal region. Pain is assessed using a Numeric pain rating (NPRS). The scale ranges from 0 to 10. 0 indicates "no pain", and 10 indicates "worst Pain. mild pain score 1 to 3 moderate pain score 4 to 7 severe pain score with interference with functioning. 8 to 10

Oswestry disability score

时间窗: upto 4 weeks

Oswestry Disability score is used to measure low back disability. Each ten item is scored from 0 to 5, and the total is added and multiplied by 2. Therefore, the ODI ranges from 0 to 100. A higher score on the ODI indicates a more severe disability caused by LBP. Oswestry Disability Index will evaluate disability for disability. This questionnaire will be used to assess disability. It comprises 10 items, 7 related to daily activities, 2 related to pain, and 1 related to concentration. Each item scores from 0 to 5. The total score is expressed as a percentage with higher scores related to more significant disability

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验