跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01058382
NCT01058382已完成不适用

Progesterone Support for Frozen Embryo Transfer: Intramuscular Versus Vaginal Suppository - A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial

Charles Coddington1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 57 人开始时间: 2010年2月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
57
试验地点
1
主要终点
Clinical Pregnancy Rate

研究概览

简要总结

There have been two very common forms of progesterone administration that have been used during ovulation induction, in vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo transfers. There are currently no randomized clinical trials to demonstrate which method of progesterone administration is more effective for frozen embryo transfer. We raise the question: Is there a difference between the two accepted methods of progesterone administration, intramuscular and vaginal suppositories, for frozen embryo transfer? Studies for fresh embryo transfer after in vitro fertilization, have demonstrated that there is not a difference between the two methods of progesterone administration. We will evaluate the question for frozen embryo transfer.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
20 Years 至 50 Years(Adult)
性别
Female
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Females < 50 years of age
  • Having frozen embryo transfer at Mayo Clinic
  • Embryos have been created prior to age 42
  • Willing to be randomized to either method of progesterone administration

排除标准

  • Diagnosis of severe medical illness
  • Uterine lesions affecting the cavity or endometrium
  • Uterine anomaly
  • Presence of hydrosalpinx
  • Extreme difficulty with embryo transfer

研究组 & 干预措施

Progesterone Vaginal Suppositories

干预措施: Progesterone Vaginal Suppositories (Drug)

Intramuscular Progesterone-in-Oil

干预措施: Intramuscular Progesterone-in-Oil (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

Clinical Pregnancy Rate

时间窗: 3 years

次要结局

  • Implantation rate(3 years)

研究者

发起方
Charles Coddington
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor Investigator
主要研究者

Charles Coddington

Charles C. Coddington MD

Mayo Clinic

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验