Progesterone Support of FET
- Conditions
- Frozen Embryo Pregnancy Rate
- Interventions
- Drug: Intramuscular Progesterone-in-Oil
- Registration Number
- NCT01058382
- Lead Sponsor
- Charles Coddington
- Brief Summary
There have been two very common forms of progesterone administration that have been used during ovulation induction, in vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo transfers. There are currently no randomized clinical trials to demonstrate which method of progesterone administration is more effective for frozen embryo transfer. We raise the question: Is there a difference between the two accepted methods of progesterone administration, intramuscular and vaginal suppositories, for frozen embryo transfer? Studies for fresh embryo transfer after in vitro fertilization, have demonstrated that there is not a difference between the two methods of progesterone administration. We will evaluate the question for frozen embryo transfer.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- Female
- Target Recruitment
- 57
- Females < 50 years of age
- Having frozen embryo transfer at Mayo Clinic
- Embryos have been created prior to age 42
- Willing to be randomized to either method of progesterone administration
- Diagnosis of severe medical illness
- Uterine lesions affecting the cavity or endometrium
- Uterine anomaly
- Presence of hydrosalpinx
- Extreme difficulty with embryo transfer
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Progesterone Vaginal Suppositories Progesterone Vaginal Suppositories - Intramuscular Progesterone-in-Oil Intramuscular Progesterone-in-Oil -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Clinical Pregnancy Rate 3 years
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Implantation rate 3 years
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Mayo Clinic in Rochester
🇺🇸Rochester, Minnesota, United States