MedPath

ProSALUTE: Community Program for Cardiovascular Health

Not Applicable
Conditions
Primary Prevention
Interventions
Other: Screening and prevention of CVD
Registration Number
NCT03129165
Lead Sponsor
Centro Cardiologico Monzino
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and cost/effectiveness (change in CV risk factors and lifestyle vs costs) of ProSALUTE as a new organizational model of primary CV prevention.

Detailed Description

Primary Cardiovascular (CV) prevention programs in the healthcare place and community-based interventions have a variable impact on health at the population level. The largest benefit may be obtained by addressing high-risk, disadvantaged and traditionally hard-to-reach groups.

Effective actions include health promotion, timely screening of modifiable risk factors, application of evidence-based targets and interventions, broad access to heart-friendly environments/facilities and dissemination of favorable social norms. Thus, community prevention is a multifaceted task that requires multidisciplinary collaboration. A suitable program should be tailored to the specific social context and make the most of local resources to improve access, adherence and continuity, as well as sustainability.

ProSALUTE is a new model of primary CV prevention for the prevalently low-income and multiethnic community of Ponte Lambro (n=3600 adults), the neighborhood where the coordinating hospital (Centro Cardiologico Monzino, Milan, Italy) is located.

Under the coordination of a Case Manager (a Nursing Researcher) the citizens are involved in a prevention program, which is personalized (content and intensity) according to the individual global risk and specific risk factors. The citizens follow an individualized schedule of short-term specialist care. Besides, the participants are "gently nudged" to make use of local resources that may contribute to sustain a healthy life-style (e.g. parks, gyms, social services, etc). Moreover, public preventive events for the community are devised (e.g. healthy-cooking course, walking groups, etc) through a collaborative network with representatives of the neighborhood.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
600
Inclusion Criteria
  • Live in Milan at neighborhood of Ponte Lambro
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients with known atherosclerotic disease (secondary prevention)
  • Severe diseases or disabilities that hinder the participation in the program

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Screening and prevention of CVDScreening and prevention of CVD-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Primary adherence at baseline screeningBaseline

Primary adherence evaluated as the ratio between the number of subjects enrolled and the number of subjects actively contacted through personal postal mail

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Influence of immigrant or native status on primary adherenceBaseline

Assessed as rate of primary adherence according to immigrant (from any country) or native status

Influence of education level on primary adherenceBaseline

Assessed as rate of primary adherence according to educational level (years of schooling \<8, 8-12 or \>12)

Persistence in the program at 6th months6 months

Persistence assessed as the ratio between subjects followed at 6 months and subjects enrolled

Changes in adherence to MD at 6 months6 months

Assessed as the net improvement in category of adherence to MD (number of those who increased minus number of those who decreased)

Changes in objective measures of cigarette smoke exposure6 months

Assessed as the net improvement in exhaled Carbon Monoxide (CO) (number of smokers who reduced ≥10% exhaled CO ppm minus number of smokers who increased ≥10% exhaled CO ppm)

Global change in traditional risk factors at 6th months6 months

Assessed as the number of subjects who improved by ≥10% at least one traditional CV risk factor measure without worsening by ≥10% any other CV risk factor measure. The CV risk factors considered are: glycaemia \>126 mg/dl, LDL-C \>115 mg/dl, systolic blood pressure \>140 mmHg and BMI \>28

Global change in estimated risk at 6th months6 months

Assessed as net improvement in Framingham Risk Score (number of subjects who reduced the score minus number of subjects who increased the score)

Awareness of own cardiovascular risk factorsBaseline

Awareness assessed as prevalence of knowledge (answer: known value or not known) of levels of the following personal cardiovascular risk factors: total cholesterol, triglycerides, glycaemia, systolic and diastolic blood pressure

Prevalence of positive screening for anxietyBaseline

Anxiety assessed using General Anxiety Disorder 2 (GAD-2) test and defined as positive with a score ≥3

Extent of adherence to the Mediterranean Diet (MD)Baseline

Extent of adherence to MD assessed using the PREDIMED questionnaire and score, using three categories (0-7 low adherence; 8-9 medium adherence, ≥10 high adherence)

Prevalence of physically active subjectsBaseline

Physical activity (PA) assessed using the PASSI questionnaire and physically active subjects defined according to the WHO 2010 Guidelines

Change in positive screening for depression6 months

Assessed as the net improvement in screening for depression (number of positive who became negative minus number of negative who became positive)

Persistence in the program at 12th months12 months

Persistence assessed as the ratio between subjects followed at 12 months and subjects enrolled

Global change in estimated risk at 12th months12 months

Assessed as net improvement in Framingham Risk Score (number of subjects who reduced the score minus number of subjects who increased the score)

Influence of working category on primary adherenceBaseline

Assessed as rate of primary adherence according to working category (manual worker, service worker, office worker, unemployed, retired)

Prevalence of positive screening for depressionBaseline

Depressive mood assessed using Patient Health Questionnaire 2 (PHQ-2) test and defined as positive with a score ≥3

Human resources utilizationBaseline

Percent of enrolled subjects allocated to medical visit, interview with nutritionist, motivational interview to promote physical activity, smoking-cessation program, interview with psychologist

Change in positive screening for anxiety6 months

Assessed as the net improvement in screening for anxiety (number of positive who became negative minus number of negative who became positive)

Global change in traditional risk factors at 12th months12 months

Assessed as the number of subjects who improved by ≥10% at least one traditional CV risk factor measure without worsening by ≥10% any other CV risk factor measure. The CV risk factors considered are: glycaemia \>126 mg/dl, LDL-C \>115 mg/dl, systolic blood pressure \>140 mmHg and BMI \>28

Accuracy of the perception of own cardiovascular riskBaseline

Accuracy assessed as concordance (using Cohen's kappa test) between risk perception (evaluated through a 5 point Likert scale questionnaire: from very low to very high) and estimated cardiovascular risk (evaluated through the Framingham Risk Score)

Changes in PA at 6 months6 months

Assessed as the net improvement in category of PA level (number of sedentary subjects shifted to active or moderate minus number of active or moderate shifted to sedentary)

Changes in declared cigarette consumption6 months

Assessed as the net improvement in extent of cigarette consumption (number of smokers who reduced the number of cigarettes/day minus number of smokers who increased the number of cigarettes/day)

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Centro Cardiologico Monzino

🇮🇹

Milan, Italy

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath