Conventional Biopsies vs pCLE for Diagnosis of Superficial Gastric Neoplasia
- Conditions
- Gastric DysplasiaEarly Gastric Cancer
- Interventions
- Procedure: Endoscopic submucosal dissection
- Registration Number
- NCT01688687
- Lead Sponsor
- Soonchunhyang University Hospital
- Brief Summary
Confocal endomicroscopy (CLE) allows real-time in-vivo high-resolution and high-magnification imaging of the gastrointestinal epithelium, which is comparable to histopathology. Previous studies have investigated the accuracy of pCLE for diagnosis and differentiated of colorectal polyps, Barrett's esophagus and pancreaticobiliary strictures. However, to date there are limited data exploring the application of pCLE to gastric lesions, and this is the first study comparing the diagnosis of conventional forceps biopsy with that of pCLE using the final specimens obtained from endoscopic resection as a reference standard. The aims of this study were (1) the accuracy of pCLE compared to conventional forceps biopsy using histopathology results following endoscopic resection as a reference, and (2) comparison of "real time" in-vivo pCLE diagnosis with that of blinded "off-line" pCLE diagnosis, and off-line interobserver agreement.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 63
- Patients with biospy proven superficial gastric neoplasia, suitable for endoscopic resection.
- Patients with uncorrectable coagulopathy,
- liver cirrhosis,
- acute gastrointestinal bleeding,
- pregnancy,
- breast feeding,
- documented allergy to fluorescein,
- patients with lesions that were deemed unsuitable for endoscopic resection, and
- patients without documented conventional biopsy results.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- OBSERVATIONAL
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Superficial gastric neoplasia Endoscopic submucosal dissection Patients with superficial gastric neoplasia on diagnostic endoscopy, recieved both conventional endoscopic forcpes biopsies and pCLE. All patients were subject to endoscopic resection of the lesion.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method The accuracy of pCLE compared to conventional forceps biopsy in-vivo pCLE accuracy compared to conventional forceps biopsy was assessed 1-2 weeks prior to endoscopic resection. The accuracy of pCLE compared to conventional forceps biopsy was assessed using histopathology results following endoscopic resection as a reference
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Comparison of "real time" in-vivo pCLE diagnosis with that of blinded "off-line" pCLE diagnosis. 1-3 months after endoscopic resection and final histopathological analysis Off-line pCLE interobserver agreement 1-3 months after endoscopic resection and final histopathological analysis
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital
🇰🇷Seoul, Korea, Republic of