跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04954872
NCT04954872已完成不适用

Comparing Strategies for Competency-based Training in Problem Management Plus to Improve Non-specialist Competencies for Responding to Psychological Distress: a Randomized Controlled Trial

George Washington University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 99 人开始时间: 2021年6月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
99
试验地点
1
主要终点
Enhancing Assessment of Common Therapeutic Factors (unabbreviated title: Enhancing Assessment of Common Therapeutic Factors)

研究概览

简要总结

The proposed study in Nepal will evaluate if non-specialists participating in Equip-based Problem Management Plus training show greater competencies compared to non-specialists participating in standard Problem Management Plus training. The proposed study is a randomized controlled trial with mixed-methods components evaluating both quantitative outcomes and qualitative outcomes among non-specialists participating in the training and their trainers.

详细描述

There is increasing recognition of the high burden of psychological distress among populations around the world. Increasingly, non-specialists (persons who do not have expertise in formal mental health training) are being used to deliver psychological services. There is a long history of successful implementation of psychological services by non-specialists in Nepal. Recently, a cluster randomized controlled trial of Problem Management Plus showed modest benefit over enhanced care as usual in southeastern Nepal. A recent initiative by the World Health Organization is being rolled out to improve the competencies of non-specialists participating in Problem Management Plus and similar trainings. This initiative is Ensuring Quality in Psychological Services (Equip). The proposed study in Nepal will evaluate if non-specialists participating in Equip-based Problem Management Plus training show greater competencies compared to non-specialists participating in standard Problem Management Plus training. The proposed study is a randomized controlled trial with mixed-methods components evaluating both quantitative outcomes and qualitative outcomes among non-specialists participating in the training and their trainers.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Health Services Research
盲法
Double (Care Provider, Outcomes Assessor)

盲法说明

The persons without mental health professional training who are randomized to either training as usual or Equip-based training will not be informed about how the two training arms differ. Outcome assessors will not be told if the trainees are in training as usual or Equip-based training.

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
是

入选标准

  • •No prior mental health professional training
  • •Literate in Nepali

排除标准

  • •Any prior mental health professional training

研究组 & 干预措施

Training as usual

Active Comparator

Standard Problem Management Plus training.

干预措施: Standard Problem Management Plus training (training as usual) (Behavioral)

Equip-based training

Experimental

Training that uses the Equip platform to assess competencies and incorporate this information into trainers and supervisors activities.

干预措施: Equip-based Problem Management Plus training (Behavioral)

结局指标

主要结局

Enhancing Assessment of Common Therapeutic Factors (unabbreviated title: Enhancing Assessment of Common Therapeutic Factors)

时间窗: Immediately after Problem Management Plus training (10-days post-baseline)

15-item tool with 4 response levels, range is 15 to 60, with higher scores equating to more competency

次要结局

  • Enhancing Assessment of Common Therapeutic Factors (unabbreviated title: Enhancing Assessment of Common Therapeutic Factors)(After Problem Management Plus supervision (approximately 45-days post-baseline))
  • Problem Management Plus Competency Assessment (unabbreviated title: Problem Management Plus Competency Assessment)(After Problem Management Plus supervision (approximately 45-days post-baseline))
  • Group Facilitation Competency Assessment (unabbreviated title: Group Facilitation Competency Assessment)(After Problem Management Plus supervision (approximately 45-days post-baseline))
  • Problem Management Plus Competency Assessment (unabbreviated title: Problem Management Plus Competency Assessment)(Immediately after Problem Management Plus training (10-days post-baseline))
  • Group Facilitation Competency Assessment (unabbreviated title: Group Facilitation Competency Assessment)(Immediately after Problem Management Plus training (10-days post-baseline))

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Brandon A Kohrt, MD, PhD

Professor

George Washington University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验